Championship · 2025Sat, 1 Nov 2025, 15:00 UTCFull timeSt. Andrew's @ Knighthead ParkFull-time recap
40Full-time recap

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

This match

Match statistics

MetricBirmingham CityPortsmouth
Shots19 shots/match5 shots/match
Shots on target7 shots/match0 shots/match
Expected goals3.11 xG/match0.23 xG/match
Possession43%57%
Corners9 corners/match5 corners/match
Fouls12 fouls/match10 fouls/match

Every shot

Shot map

Every recorded shot, placed where it was taken and sized by its expected-goals value. Each team attacks towards its own end of the pitch.

Patrick Roberts · Birmingham City · 26′ · 0.02 xG · off target or blockedTomoki Iwata · Birmingham City · 44′ · 0.02 xG · off target or blockedJay Stansfield · Birmingham City · 52′ · 0.02 xG · off target or blockedAlex Cochrane · Birmingham City · 16′ · 0.03 xG · off target or blockedSeung Ho Paik · Birmingham City · 17′ · 0.03 xG · off target or blockedMárk Kosznovszky · Portsmouth · 90′ · 0.03 xG · off target or blockedMarvin Ducksch · Birmingham City · 1′ · 0.04 xG · on targetSeung Ho Paik · Birmingham City · 9′ · 0.05 xG · goalSeung Ho Paik · Birmingham City · 9′ · 0.05 xG · off target or blockedDemarai Gray · Birmingham City · 25′ · 0.05 xG · off target or blockedAndre Dozzell · Portsmouth · 90′ · 0.05 xG · off target or blockedJohn Swift · Portsmouth · 24′ · 0.06 xG · off target or blockedTomoki Iwata · Birmingham City · 56′ · 0.06 xG · goalJosh Knight · Portsmouth · 84′ · 0.06 xG · off target or blockedKeshi Anderson · Birmingham City · 88′ · 0.08 xG · goalTomoki Iwata · Birmingham City · 19′ · 0.09 xG · off target or blockedIbane Bowat · Portsmouth · 31′ · 0.09 xG · off target or blockedKeshi Anderson · Birmingham City · 47′ · 0.10 xG · off target or blockedKyogo Furuhashi · Birmingham City · 67′ · 0.16 xG · off target or blockedTomoki Iwata · Birmingham City · 54′ · 0.19 xG · on targetDemarai Gray · Birmingham City · 49′ · 0.32 xG · off target or blockedJay Stansfield · Birmingham City · 6′ · 0.51 xG · off target or blockedChristoph Klarer · Birmingham City · 61′ · 0.52 xG · goalJay Stansfield · Birmingham City · 6′ · 0.82 xG · on target
  • off target
  • on target
  • goal
  • penalty
  • size = xG

Birmingham City: 19 shots, 7 on target, 3.16 xG. Portsmouth: 5 shots, 0 on target, 0.29 xG.

How the match built

Expected-goals timeline

Expected goals accumulated minute by minute. Circles mark the goals that were actually scored.

01.753.50′HT90′Seung Ho Paik · Birmingham City · 9′Tomoki Iwata · Birmingham City · 56′Christoph Klarer · Birmingham City · 61′Keshi Anderson · Birmingham City · 88′

The step line is cumulative expected goals; circles mark goals. Final: Birmingham City 3.16 xG · Portsmouth 0.29 xG.

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: Birmingham City's home-only shot average is above their full-season average. A second useful context is: Birmingham City's last-five goals scored average is above their season average. Limitation: Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.

Birmingham City have a visible home split

moderate

Birmingham City's home-only shot average is above their full-season average.

19.7 shots/matchShotsHome only · Season14.2 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.

Window: home

MetricHome onlySeasonBaseline
Shots19.7 shots/match14.2 shots/match12.4 shots/match

Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.

Birmingham City's recent record differs from the season

moderate

Birmingham City's last-five goals scored average is above their season average.

1.6 goals/matchGoals forLast 5 · Season1.15 goals/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.

Window: last_5 versus season

MetricLast 5SeasonBaseline
Goals for1.6 goals/match1.15 goals/match1.19 goals/match

Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.

Portsmouth show a distinct attacking-volume record

moderate

Portsmouth's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.

14.2 shots/matchShotsBirmingham City · Portsmouth11.5 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.

Window: season

MetricBirmingham CityPortsmouthBaseline
Shots14.2 shots/match11.5 shots/match12.4 shots/match
Shots against7.92 shots/match13.7 shots/match12.6 shots/match

Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.

Metric comparison

Values, percentiles and samples

Where the edge is

Birmingham City favored in 9 of 14 directional metrics · Portsmouth in 0 · 5 too close

1.15 goals/matchGoals scoredseason · 13/130.77 goals/match
1.15 goals/matchGoals allowedseason · 13/131.31 goals/match
1.48 xG/matchExpected goalsseason · 13/131.1 xG/match
0.92 xG/matchExpected goals allowedseason · 13/131.51 xG/match
14.2 shots/matchShotsseason · 12/1211.5 shots/match
7.92 shots/matchShots allowedseason · 12/1213.7 shots/match
3.33 shots/matchShots on targetseason · 12/122.83 shots/match
2.58 shots/matchShots on target allowedseason · 12/124.17 shots/match
57%Possessionseason · 12/1249.5%
5.83 corners/matchCornersseason · 12/125.17 corners/match
3.33 corners/matchCorners allowedseason · 12/125.58 corners/match
Cardsseason · 0/0
11.7 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 12/1210.3 fouls/match
Passesseason · 0/0
Pass accuracyseason · 0/0
Shots inside boxseason · 0/0
Blocked shotsseason · 0/0
Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0
Offsidesseason · 0/0
31%Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 13/1331%
69%Scoring frequencyseason · 13/1369%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

Birmingham City93.8
Portsmouth47.9
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 92%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

Birmingham City50
Portsmouth11.8
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 95%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

Birmingham City84.7
Portsmouth30.6
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 95%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

Birmingham City47.9
Portsmouth22.9
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 92%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

Birmingham City66.7
Portsmouth35.4
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 46%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

Birmingham City81.2
Portsmouth56.2
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 92%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

Birmingham City64
Portsmouth30.2
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 92%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Last 5

5 / 5 matches
1.6 goals/matchGoals scored5/50.6 goals/match
1 goals/matchGoals allowed5/51.6 goals/match
1.77 xG/matchExpected goals5/50.83 xG/match
17.3 shots/matchShots4/48.75 shots/match
4.75 shots/matchShots on target4/41.75 shots/match
59.3%Possession4/446.8%
7.25 corners/matchCorners4/44.25 corners/match
Cards0/0
8.25 fouls/matchFouls4/410 fouls/match

Window

Last 10

10 / 10 matches
1.1 goals/matchGoals scored10/100.7 goals/match
1.3 goals/matchGoals allowed10/101.4 goals/match
1.43 xG/matchExpected goals10/101.04 xG/match
15 shots/matchShots9/911.3 shots/match
3.56 shots/matchShots on target9/92.56 shots/match
56.4%Possession9/949.9%
6.67 corners/matchCorners9/95.11 corners/match
Cards0/0
11.1 fouls/matchFouls9/910 fouls/match

Window

Season

13 / 13 matches
1.15 goals/matchGoals scored13/130.77 goals/match
1.15 goals/matchGoals allowed13/131.31 goals/match
1.48 xG/matchExpected goals13/131.1 xG/match
14.2 shots/matchShots12/1211.5 shots/match
3.33 shots/matchShots on target12/122.83 shots/match
57%Possession12/1249.5%
5.83 corners/matchCorners12/125.17 corners/match
Cards0/0
11.7 fouls/matchFouls12/1210.3 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

6 / 6 matches
1.83 goals/matchGoals scored6/60.67 goals/match
1 goals/matchGoals allowed6/61.33 goals/match
2.15 xG/matchExpected goals6/60.85 xG/match
19.7 shots/matchShots6/67.83 shots/match
5.17 shots/matchShots on target6/62.5 shots/match
57.7%Possession6/646.3%
6.67 corners/matchCorners6/64.17 corners/match
Cards0/0
12.3 fouls/matchFouls6/611.7 fouls/match

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

7.04 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/17.15 days
2 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/13 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade A · Strong evidenceready
Season samples13 / 13home / away teams
Recent samples5 / 5last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
Analysis cutoff: Sat, 1 Nov 2025, 19:00 UTC · analysis-v4

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Create a graphic from this match