Championship · 2025Sat, 21 Mar 2026, 15:00 UTCFull timeLoftus Road StadiumFull-time recap
61Full-time recap

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

This match

Match statistics

MetricQueens Park RangersPortsmouth
Shots9 shots/match20 shots/match
Shots on target8 shots/match7 shots/match
Expected goals1.63 xG/match1.64 xG/match
Possession40%60%
Corners1 corners/match9 corners/match
Fouls15 fouls/match11 fouls/match

Every shot

Shot map

Every recorded shot, placed where it was taken and sized by its expected-goals value. Each team attacks towards its own end of the pitch.

Conor Shaughnessy · Portsmouth · 45′ · 0.00 xG · off target or blockedAdrian Segečić · Portsmouth · 40′ · 0.01 xG · off target or blockedTerry Devlin · Portsmouth · 45′ · 0.02 xG · on targetRichard Kone · Queens Park Rangers · 61′ · 0.03 xG · on targetDaniel Bennie · Queens Park Rangers · 84′ · 0.03 xG · on targetJohn Swift · Portsmouth · 19′ · 0.04 xG · on targetMillenic Alli · Portsmouth · 20′ · 0.04 xG · off target or blockedPaul Smyth · Queens Park Rangers · 7′ · 0.05 xG · goalRayan Kolli · Queens Park Rangers · 24′ · 0.05 xG · goalJohn Swift · Portsmouth · 27′ · 0.05 xG · off target or blockedJohn Swift · Portsmouth · 38′ · 0.05 xG · goalMarlon Pack · Portsmouth · 64′ · 0.05 xG · on targetGustavo Caballero · Portsmouth · 65′ · 0.05 xG · off target or blockedRayan Kolli · Queens Park Rangers · 72′ · 0.05 xG · off target or blockedMarlon Pack · Portsmouth · 69′ · 0.06 xG · on targetRayan Kolli · Queens Park Rangers · 55′ · 0.07 xG · goalConor Chaplin · Portsmouth · 61′ · 0.07 xG · off target or blockedEbou Adams · Portsmouth · 64′ · 0.08 xG · off target or blockedMarlon Pack · Portsmouth · 67′ · 0.08 xG · off target or blockedRegan Poole · Portsmouth · 65′ · 0.10 xG · off target or blockedMarlon Pack · Portsmouth · 47′ · 0.11 xG · off target or blockedMarlon Pack · Portsmouth · 78′ · 0.11 xG · on targetEbou Adams · Portsmouth · 70′ · 0.12 xG · on targetRichard Kone · Queens Park Rangers · 88′ · 0.12 xG · goalMarlon Pack · Portsmouth · 82′ · 0.14 xG · off target or blockedJacob Brown · Portsmouth · 47′ · 0.15 xG · off target or blockedEbou Adams · Portsmouth · 34′ · 0.30 xG · off target or blockedPaul Smyth · Queens Park Rangers · 29′ · 0.42 xG · goalRichard Kone · Queens Park Rangers · 86′ · 0.82 xG · goal
  • off target
  • on target
  • goal
  • penalty
  • size = xG

Queens Park Rangers: 9 shots, 8 on target, 1.64 xG. Portsmouth: 20 shots, 7 on target, 1.63 xG.

How the match built

Expected-goals timeline

Expected goals accumulated minute by minute. Circles mark the goals that were actually scored.

0120′HT90′Paul Smyth · Queens Park Rangers · 7′Rayan Kolli · Queens Park Rangers · 24′Paul Smyth · Queens Park Rangers · 29′Rayan Kolli · Queens Park Rangers · 55′Richard Kone · Queens Park Rangers · 86′Richard Kone · Queens Park Rangers · 88′John Swift · Portsmouth · 38′

The step line is cumulative expected goals; circles mark goals. Final: Queens Park Rangers 1.64 xG · Portsmouth 1.63 xG.

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: Portsmouth's last-five shots average is above their season average. A second useful context is: Portsmouth's away-only shot average is below their full-season average. Limitation: Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.

Portsmouth's recent record differs from the season

moderate

Portsmouth's last-five shots average is above their season average.

18.2 shots/matchShotsLast 5 · Season12.9 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.

Window: last_5 versus season

MetricLast 5SeasonBaseline
Shots18.2 shots/match12.9 shots/match12.5 shots/match

Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.

Portsmouth have a visible away split

moderate

Portsmouth's away-only shot average is below their full-season average.

9.79 shots/matchShotsAway only · Season12.9 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.

Window: away

MetricAway onlySeasonBaseline
Shots9.79 shots/match12.9 shots/match12.5 shots/match

Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.

Recent scheduling adds useful context

weak

A compressed recent schedule is recorded for Queens Park Rangers.

7 daysRest daysQueens Park Rangers · Portsmouth4.79 days
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Rest days and completed matches in the prior 14 days are shown directly.

Window: previous 14 days

MetricQueens Park RangersPortsmouthBaseline
Rest days7 days4.79 days
Matches last 14 days3 matches2 matches

Caveat: The database does not describe travel, rotation decisions or player-level workload.

History

Head-to-head

Recent meetings between these teams — history, not a forecast.

0Queens Park Rangers
1Draws
0Portsmouth
PortsmouthQueens Park Rangers · Championship11

Metric comparison

Values, percentiles and samples

Where the edge is

Queens Park Rangers favored in 3 of 14 directional metrics · Portsmouth in 4 · 7 too close

1.41 goals/matchGoals scoredseason · 39/380.97 goals/match
1.56 goals/matchGoals allowedseason · 39/381.42 goals/match
1.15 xG/matchExpected goalsseason · 39/381.15 xG/match
1.22 xG/matchExpected goals allowedseason · 39/381.13 xG/match
12.5 shots/matchShotsseason · 38/3712.9 shots/match
12.1 shots/matchShots allowedseason · 38/3711.2 shots/match
3.87 shots/matchShots on targetseason · 38/373.84 shots/match
4.03 shots/matchShots on target allowedseason · 38/373.86 shots/match
45.3%Possessionseason · 38/3752%
4.79 corners/matchCornersseason · 38/376.11 corners/match
5.32 corners/matchCorners allowedseason · 38/374.59 corners/match
Cardsseason · 0/0
10.7 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 37/379.92 fouls/match
Passesseason · 0/0
Pass accuracyseason · 0/0
Shots inside boxseason · 0/0
Blocked shotsseason · 0/0
Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0
Offsidesseason · 0/0
23%Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 39/3818%
74%Scoring frequencyseason · 39/3866%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

Queens Park Rangers22.9
Portsmouth64.6
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 97%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

Queens Park Rangers55.6
Portsmouth41
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 98%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

Queens Park Rangers37.5
Portsmouth50.7
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 98%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

Queens Park Rangers89.6
Portsmouth47.9
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 97%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

Queens Park Rangers52.1
Portsmouth22.9
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 47%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

Queens Park Rangers39.6
Portsmouth89.6
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 97%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

Queens Park Rangers47.4
Portsmouth54.2
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 97%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Last 5

5 / 5 matches
1.8 goals/matchGoals scored5/50.6 goals/match
1.8 goals/matchGoals allowed5/52.2 goals/match
1.06 xG/matchExpected goals5/51.19 xG/match
10.8 shots/matchShots5/518.2 shots/match
3.4 shots/matchShots on target5/55.2 shots/match
38.4%Possession5/562%
3.6 corners/matchCorners5/58.4 corners/match
Cards0/0
11.2 fouls/matchFouls5/510 fouls/match

Window

Last 10

10 / 10 matches
1.5 goals/matchGoals scored10/101 goals/match
1.9 goals/matchGoals allowed10/101.7 goals/match
1.08 xG/matchExpected goals10/101.26 xG/match
12.5 shots/matchShots10/1016.2 shots/match
4.2 shots/matchShots on target10/105.1 shots/match
42.9%Possession10/1059.3%
4.3 corners/matchCorners10/108.8 corners/match
Cards0/0
10.9 fouls/matchFouls10/109.5 fouls/match

Window

Season

39 / 38 matches
1.41 goals/matchGoals scored39/380.97 goals/match
1.56 goals/matchGoals allowed39/381.42 goals/match
1.15 xG/matchExpected goals39/381.15 xG/match
12.5 shots/matchShots38/3712.9 shots/match
3.87 shots/matchShots on target38/373.84 shots/match
45.3%Possession38/3752%
4.79 corners/matchCorners38/376.11 corners/match
Cards0/0
10.7 fouls/matchFouls37/379.92 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

19 / 19 matches
1.84 goals/matchGoals scored19/190.95 goals/match
1.63 goals/matchGoals allowed19/191.79 goals/match
1.44 xG/matchExpected goals19/190.87 xG/match
14.2 shots/matchShots19/199.79 shots/match
4.63 shots/matchShots on target19/193.11 shots/match
46.2%Possession19/1948.9%
5.53 corners/matchCorners19/195.53 corners/match
Cards0/0
10.8 fouls/matchFouls18/1910.2 fouls/match

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

7 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/14.79 days
3 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/12 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade A · Strong evidenceready
Season samples39 / 38home / away teams
Recent samples5 / 5last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
Analysis cutoff: Sat, 21 Mar 2026, 19:00 UTC · analysis-v4

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Create a graphic from this match