Chengdu Rongcheng
Super League · 2026Chengdu Rongcheng vs Tianjin Jinmen Tiger · Super League
Season
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
- Goals scored
- 1.96–1.38
- Expected goals
- 2.22–1.24
- Shots
- 15.3–11.1
- Possession
- 55.3%–43.2%
30-second read
What the record shows
The story here is recent context rather than season averages: tianjin Jinmen Tiger's last-five shots average is above their season average. Alongside it: chengdu Rongcheng have recorded the higher season possession share. Limitation: At least one team lacks a recent completed match near this fixture cutoff.
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger's recent record differs from the season
moderateTianjin Jinmen Tiger's last-five shots average is above their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 14.2 shots/match | 11.1 shots/match | 13.2 shots/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger show a distinct attacking-volume record
weakTianjin Jinmen Tiger's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Chengdu Rongcheng | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 15.3 shots/match | 11.1 shots/match | 13.2 shots/match |
| Shots against | 11.6 shots/match | 14.2 shots/match | 13.3 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
The teams have contrasting possession records
moderateChengdu Rongcheng have recorded the higher season possession share.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 12.1 percentage points.
Window: season
| Metric | Chengdu Rongcheng | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Possession | 55.3% | 43.2% | 49.3% |
Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Chengdu Rongcheng favored in 11 of 13 directional metrics · Tianjin Jinmen Tiger in 1 · 1 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 0 matches
Chengdu Rongcheng / Tianjin Jinmen Tiger
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- At least one team lacks a recent completed match near this fixture cutoff.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
- The nearest completed-match evidence is stale relative to this fixture cutoff.
More football
Related matches
Shanghai Port
Henan FC Jiuzu Dukang
Shanghai Shenhua
Yunnan Yukun
Qingdao Hainiu
Beijing GuoanTeam rankings in Super League
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.