Super League · 2026Tiexi Stadium

Liaoning Tieren FC 2–1 Qingdao Hainiu · Super League

2–1Full-time analysis

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

Match at a glance

Liaoning Tieren FC won 2–1.

Shots
1711
Shots on target
83
Expected goals
3.151.08
Possession
50%50%

Full time

What the match recorded

Shenyang Urban beat Qingdao Jonoon 2–1. Recorded in this match (Shenyang Urban – Qingdao Jonoon): shots 17–11, shots on target 8–3, expected goals 3.15–1.08, possession 50%–50%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.

Pre-match record

What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.

Qingdao Jonoon's recent record differs from the season

moderate

Qingdao Jonoon's last-five goals scored average is above their season average.

2.4 goals/match ▲Goals forLast 5 · Season1.54 goals/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.

Window: last_5 versus season

MetricLast 5SeasonBaseline
Goals for2.4 goals/match1.54 goals/match1.42 goals/match

Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.

Recent scheduling adds useful context

weak

A compressed recent schedule is recorded for Shenyang Urban, Qingdao Jonoon.

4 days ▲Rest daysShenyang Urban · Qingdao Jonoon4.96 days
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Rest days and completed matches in the prior 14 days are shown directly.

Window: previous 14 days

MetricShenyang UrbanQingdao JonoonBaseline
Rest days4 days4.96 days—
Matches last 14 days2 matches3 matches—

Caveat: The database does not describe travel, rotation decisions or player-level workload.

The teams have contrasting possession records

moderate

Shenyang Urban have recorded the higher season possession share.

54.4% ●PossessionShenyang Urban · Qingdao Jonoon43.8%
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 10.6 percentage points.

Window: season

MetricShenyang UrbanQingdao JonoonBaseline
Possession54.4%43.8%49.7%

Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.

This match

Match statistics

  • Shots17 shots11 shotsLiaoning Tieren FC 17 shots, Qingdao Hainiu 11 shots
  • Shots on target8 shots3 shotsLiaoning Tieren FC 8 shots, Qingdao Hainiu 3 shots
  • Expected goals3.15 xG1.08 xGLiaoning Tieren FC 3.15 xG, Qingdao Hainiu 1.08 xG
  • Possession50%50%Liaoning Tieren FC 50%, Qingdao Hainiu 50%
  • Corners4 corners0 cornersLiaoning Tieren FC 4 corners, Qingdao Hainiu 0 corners
  • Fouls13 fouls13 foulsLiaoning Tieren FC 13 fouls, Qingdao Hainiu 13 fouls
  • Yellow cards3 cards0 cardsLiaoning Tieren FC 3 cards, Qingdao Hainiu 0 cards
  • Passes346 passes356 passesLiaoning Tieren FC 346 passes, Qingdao Hainiu 356 passes
  • Pass accuracy75%72%Liaoning Tieren FC 75%, Qingdao Hainiu 72%
  • Shots inside box13 shots7 shotsLiaoning Tieren FC 13 shots, Qingdao Hainiu 7 shots
  • Blocked shots2 blocks2 blocksLiaoning Tieren FC 2 blocks, Qingdao Hainiu 2 blocks
  • Goalkeeper saves2 saves5 savesLiaoning Tieren FC 2 saves, Qingdao Hainiu 5 saves
  • Offsides2 offsides1 offsideLiaoning Tieren FC 2 offsides, Qingdao Hainiu 1 offside

Metric comparison

Team comparison

Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.

Where the edge is

Season: Liaoning Tieren FC favored in 7 of 13 directional metrics · Qingdao Hainiu in 3 · 3 too close

led this metric higher value (descriptive) too close

Window

Season

Liaoning Tieren FC13 matchesQingdao Hainiu13 matches
0.92 goals/matchGoals scored13/13▲ 1.54 goals/match
1.62 goals/matchGoals allowed13/131.62 goals/match
1.43 xG/match ▲Expected goals12/121.29 xG/match
12 shots/matchShots13/1311.8 shots/match
3.92 shots/matchShots on target13/134 shots/match
54.4% ●Possession13/1343.8%
4.46 corners/matchCorners13/13● 4.54 corners/match
2.67 cards/matchCards3/32 cards/match
12.6 fouls/matchFouls13/1314 fouls/match

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade A · Strong evidenceStrong evidence — ready
Season samples13 / 13home / away teams
Recent samples5 / 5last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
Analysis cutoff: Wed, 20 May 2026, 15:00 UTC · analysis-v4

Team rankings in Super League

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Turn this match into a graphicReady-made from PitchMath data · No sign-up required