Super League · 2026Wuhan Sports Centre

Wuhan Three Towns 2–2 Liaoning Tieren FC · Super League

2–2Full-time analysis

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

Match at a glance

Wuhan Three Towns and Liaoning Tieren FC drew 2–2.

Shots
1314
Shots on target
46
Possession
33%67%

Full time

What the match recorded

Wuhan Three Towns and Shenyang Urban drew 2–2. Recorded in this match (Wuhan Three Towns – Shenyang Urban): shots 13–14, shots on target 4–6, possession 33%–67%, corners 3–6. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.

Pre-match record

What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.

Shenyang Urban's recent record differs from the season

moderate

Shenyang Urban's last-five goals scored average is below their season average.

0.6 goals/match ▲Goals forLast 5 · Season0.83 goals/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.

Window: last_5 versus season

MetricLast 5SeasonBaseline
Goals for0.6 goals/match0.83 goals/match1.42 goals/match

Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.

Wuhan Three Towns have a visible home split

moderate

Wuhan Three Towns's home-only shot average is above their full-season average.

12.2 shots/match ▲ShotsHome only · Season10.1 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.

Window: home

MetricHome onlySeasonBaseline
Shots12.2 shots/match10.1 shots/match11.9 shots/match

Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.

The teams have contrasting possession records

moderate

Shenyang Urban have recorded the higher season possession share.

43.8%PossessionWuhan Three Towns · Shenyang Urban● 54.8%
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 11.0 percentage points.

Window: season

MetricWuhan Three TownsShenyang UrbanBaseline
Possession43.8%54.8%50.1%

Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.

This match

Match statistics

  • Shots13 shots14 shotsWuhan Three Towns 13 shots, Liaoning Tieren FC 14 shots
  • Shots on target4 shots6 shotsWuhan Three Towns 4 shots, Liaoning Tieren FC 6 shots
  • Possession33%67%Wuhan Three Towns 33%, Liaoning Tieren FC 67%
  • Corners3 corners6 cornersWuhan Three Towns 3 corners, Liaoning Tieren FC 6 corners
  • Fouls5 fouls11 foulsWuhan Three Towns 5 fouls, Liaoning Tieren FC 11 fouls
  • Yellow cards1 card1 cardWuhan Three Towns 1 card, Liaoning Tieren FC 1 card
  • Passes222 passes445 passesWuhan Three Towns 222 passes, Liaoning Tieren FC 445 passes
  • Pass accuracy78%85%Wuhan Three Towns 78%, Liaoning Tieren FC 85%
  • Shots inside box5 shots7 shotsWuhan Three Towns 5 shots, Liaoning Tieren FC 7 shots
  • Blocked shots2 blocks2 blocksWuhan Three Towns 2 blocks, Liaoning Tieren FC 2 blocks
  • Goalkeeper saves4 saves2 savesWuhan Three Towns 4 saves, Liaoning Tieren FC 2 saves
  • Offsides6 offsides2 offsidesWuhan Three Towns 6 offsides, Liaoning Tieren FC 2 offsides

Metric comparison

Team comparison

Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.

Where the edge is

Season: Wuhan Three Towns favored in 3 of 13 directional metrics · Liaoning Tieren FC in 7 · 3 too close

led this metric higher value (descriptive) too close

Window

Season

Wuhan Three Towns12 matchesLiaoning Tieren FC12 matches
1.33 goals/match ▲Goals scored12/120.83 goals/match
2 goals/matchGoals allowed12/12▲ 1.67 goals/match
1.16 xG/matchExpected goals9/11▲ 1.27 xG/match
10.1 shots/matchShots12/12▲ 11.6 shots/match
3.33 shots/matchShots on target12/12▲ 3.58 shots/match
43.8%Possession12/12● 54.8%
4.83 corners/match ●Corners12/124.5 corners/match
12.2 fouls/matchFouls12/1212.6 fouls/match

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade A · Strong evidenceStrong evidence — ready
Season samples12 / 12home / away teams
Recent samples5 / 5last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
Analysis cutoff: Sat, 16 May 2026, 15:00 UTC · analysis-v4

Team rankings in Super League

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Turn this match into a graphicReady-made from PitchMath data · No sign-up required