Chongqing Tonglianglong FC
Super League · 2026Chongqing Tonglianglong FC 2–0 Shenzhen Peng City · Super League
This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.
Match at a glance
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC won 2–0.
- Shots
- 12–6
- Shots on target
- 4–1
- Expected goals
- 0.92–0.26
- Possession
- 68%–32%
Full time
What the match recorded
Chongqing Tongliang Long beat Sichuan Jiuniu 2–0. Recorded in this match (Chongqing Tongliang Long – Sichuan Jiuniu): shots 12–6, shots on target 4–1, expected goals 0.92–0.26, possession 68%–32%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
Sichuan Jiuniu have a visible away split
weakSichuan Jiuniu's away-only shot average is below their full-season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.
Window: away
| Metric | Away only | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 7.67 shots/match | 12.3 shots/match | 12.5 shots/match |
Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.
Sichuan Jiuniu show a distinct attacking-volume record
moderateSichuan Jiuniu's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Chongqing Tongliang Long | Sichuan Jiuniu | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 10.2 shots/match | 12.3 shots/match | 12.5 shots/match |
| Shots against | 8 shots/match | 15.3 shots/match | 13.2 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
Chongqing Tongliang Long's recent record differs from the season
weakChongqing Tongliang Long's last-five goals scored average is above their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 1.8 goals/match | 1.5 goals/match | 1.33 goals/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
This match
Match statistics
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Chongqing Tonglianglong FC favored in 8 of 13 directional metrics · Shenzhen Peng City in 4 · 1 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 2 matches
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC / Shenzhen Peng City
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
More football
Related matches
Shanghai Port
Beijing Guoan
Shandong Taishan
Wuhan Three Towns
Chengdu RongchengTeam rankings in Super League
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.