Wuhan Three Towns
Super League · 2026Wuhan Three Towns 0–1 Chengdu Rongcheng · Super League
This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.
Match at a glance
Chengdu Rongcheng won 0–1.
- Shots
- 15–9
- Shots on target
- 2–3
- Expected goals
- 1.73–1.67
- Possession
- 52%–48%
Full time
What the match recorded
Chengdu Better City beat Wuhan Three Towns 1–0. Recorded in this match (Wuhan Three Towns – Chengdu Better City): shots 15–9, shots on target 2–3, expected goals 1.73–1.67, possession 52%–48%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
Chengdu Better City have a visible away split
weakChengdu Better City's away-only shot average is below their full-season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.
Window: away
| Metric | Away only | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 11 shots/match | 15.3 shots/match | 12.5 shots/match |
Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.
Wuhan Three Towns show a distinct attacking-volume record
moderateWuhan Three Towns's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Wuhan Three Towns | Chengdu Better City | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 10.2 shots/match | 15.3 shots/match | 12.5 shots/match |
| Shots against | 13.7 shots/match | 9.67 shots/match | 13.2 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
Wuhan Three Towns's recent record differs from the season
weakWuhan Three Towns's last-five goals scored average is above their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 1.6 goals/match | 1.33 goals/match | 1.33 goals/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
This match
Match statistics
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Wuhan Three Towns favored in 0 of 13 directional metrics · Chengdu Rongcheng in 13
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
Wuhan Three Towns / Chengdu Rongcheng
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
More football
Related matches
Zhejiang
Yunnan Yukun
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger
Beijing GuoanTeam rankings in Super League
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.