HamKam
Eliteserien · 2026HamKam 1–4 Tromsø IL · Eliteserien
This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.
Match at a glance
Tromsø IL won 1–4.
- Shots
- 6–23
- Shots on target
- 2–7
- Expected goals
- 0.8–1.9
- Possession
- 37%–63%
Full time
What the match recorded
Tromsø IL beat HamKam 4–1. Recorded in this match (HamKam – Tromsø IL): shots 6–23, shots on target 2–7, expected goals 0.8–1.9, possession 37%–63%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
HamKam show a distinct attacking-volume record
moderateHamKam's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | HamKam | Tromsø IL | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 10.3 shots/match | 13.9 shots/match | 12 shots/match |
| Shots against | 15.2 shots/match | 10.3 shots/match | 13.2 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
Tromsø IL have a visible away split
moderateTromsø IL's away-only shot average is below their full-season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.
Window: away
| Metric | Away only | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 11.5 shots/match | 13.9 shots/match | 12 shots/match |
Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.
This match
Match statistics
Every shot
Shot map
Every recorded shot, placed where it was taken and sized by its expected-goals value. Arrows show each team’s attacking direction.
- off target
- on target
- goal
- penalty
- size = xG
HamKam: 6 shots, 2 on target, 0.85 xG. Tromsø IL: 19 shots, 6 on target, 1.89 xG. · 4 unplaced
How the match built
Expected-goals timeline
Expected goals accumulated minute by minute. Circles mark the goals that were actually scored.
The step line is cumulative expected goals; circles mark goals. Final: HamKam 0.85 xG · Tromsø IL 1.89 xG.
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: HamKam favored in 1 of 13 directional metrics · Tromsø IL in 10 · 2 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 1 match
HamKam / Tromsø IL
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
More football
Related matches
Bodø/Glimt
Vålerenga IF
Kristiansund BK
Sarpsborg 08
Lillestrøm SK
KFUM OsloTeam rankings in Eliteserien
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.