Allsvenskan · 2026Sat, 9 May 2026, 13:00 UTCFull timeStora VallaFull-time recap

Degerfors IF

WLWDD

1–4Full-time recap

Mjallby AIF

LWDWW

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

This match

Match statistics

Metric	Degerfors IF	Mjallby AIF
Shots	16 shots/match▲	11 shots/match
Shots on target	3 shots/match	6 shots/match▲
Possession	42%	58%
Corners	3 corners/match	5 corners/match
Fouls	16 fouls/match	12 fouls/match
Yellow cards	1 cards/match▲	2 cards/match

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: Mjallby AIF's last-five goals scored average is above their season average. A second useful context is: Mjallby AIF's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines. Limitation: Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.

Mjallby AIF's recent record differs from the season

moderate

Mjallby AIF's last-five goals scored average is above their season average.

2.4 goals/match▲Goals forLast 5 · Season1.71 goals/match

Evidence and caveat

Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.

Window: last_5 versus season

Metric	Last 5	Season	Baseline
Goals for	2.4 goals/match	1.71 goals/match	1.36 goals/match

Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.

Mjallby AIF show a distinct attacking-volume record

weak

Mjallby AIF's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.

10.7 shots/match▲ShotsDegerfors IF · Mjallby AIF13.6 shots/match

Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.

Window: season

Metric	Degerfors IF	Mjallby AIF	Baseline
Shots	10.7 shots/match	13.6 shots/match	13.5 shots/match
Shots against	9.43 shots/match	16.6 shots/match	12.8 shots/match

Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.

Metric comparison

Values, percentiles and samples

Where the edge is

Degerfors IF favored in 3 of 14 directional metrics · Mjallby AIF in 5 · 6 too close

1.14 goals/matchGoals scoredseason · 7/7▲1.71 goals/match

1.57 goals/matchGoals allowedseason · 7/7▲1.14 goals/match

0.85 xG/matchExpected goalsseason · 6/31.43 xG/match

1.15 xG/matchExpected goals allowedseason · 6/31.99 xG/match

10.7 shots/matchShotsseason · 7/7▲13.6 shots/match

9.43 shots/match▲Shots allowedseason · 7/716.6 shots/match

3 shots/matchShots on targetseason · 7/7▲5.86 shots/match

3.86 shots/match▲Shots on target allowedseason · 7/74.57 shots/match

47.7%Possessionseason · 7/755.3%

4.14 corners/matchCornersseason · 7/75.29 corners/match

3.86 corners/matchCorners allowedseason · 7/73.71 corners/match

—Cardsseason · 0/0—

15.6 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 7/712.1 fouls/match

—Passesseason · 0/0—

—Pass accuracyseason · 0/0—

—Shots inside boxseason · 0/0—

—Blocked shotsseason · 0/0—

—Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0—

—Offsidesseason · 0/0—

14%Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 7/7▲43%

71%▲Scoring frequencyseason · 7/757%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

Degerfors IF40.6

Mjallby AIF84.4

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

Degerfors IF17.7

Mjallby AIF74

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

Degerfors IF66.7

Mjallby AIF47.9

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

Degerfors IF9.4

Mjallby AIF28.1

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

Degerfors IF90.6

Mjallby AIF40.6

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 50%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

Degerfors IF28.1

Mjallby AIF65.6

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

Degerfors IF37.5

Mjallby AIF64

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Last 5

5 / 5 matches

1 goals/matchGoals scored5/5▲2.4 goals/match

1.6 goals/matchGoals allowed5/5▲0.6 goals/match

0.83 xG/matchExpected goals4/2—

11.6 shots/matchShots5/511.8 shots/match

3 shots/matchShots on target5/5▲5.8 shots/match

48.2%Possession5/555.2%

3.4 corners/matchCorners5/54.4 corners/match

—Cards0/0—

15 fouls/matchFouls5/512.2 fouls/match

Window

Last 10

7 / 7 matches

1.14 goals/matchGoals scored7/7▲1.71 goals/match

1.57 goals/matchGoals allowed7/7▲1.14 goals/match

0.85 xG/matchExpected goals6/3▲1.43 xG/match

10.7 shots/matchShots7/7▲13.6 shots/match

3 shots/matchShots on target7/7▲5.86 shots/match

47.7%Possession7/755.3%

4.14 corners/matchCorners7/75.29 corners/match

—Cards0/0—

15.6 fouls/matchFouls7/712.1 fouls/match

Window

Season

7 / 7 matches

1.14 goals/matchGoals scored7/7▲1.71 goals/match

1.57 goals/matchGoals allowed7/7▲1.14 goals/match

0.85 xG/matchExpected goals6/3▲1.43 xG/match

10.7 shots/matchShots7/7▲13.6 shots/match

3 shots/matchShots on target7/7▲5.86 shots/match

47.7%Possession7/755.3%

4.14 corners/matchCorners7/75.29 corners/match

—Cards0/0—

15.6 fouls/matchFouls7/712.1 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

5 / 4 matches

0.8 goals/matchGoals scored5/4▲1.75 goals/match

2 goals/matchGoals allowed5/4▲1.5 goals/match

0.69 xG/matchExpected goals4/1—

11.2 shots/matchShots5/4▲12.3 shots/match

2.2 shots/matchShots on target5/4▲6 shots/match

48.6%Possession5/452%

4.6 corners/matchCorners5/43 corners/match

—Cards0/0—

17.8 fouls/matchFouls5/413 fouls/match

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

7 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/16.04 days

2 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/12 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade B · Useful evidencelimited

Season samples7 / 7home / away teams

Recent samples5 / 5last-five windows

FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match

Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.

Known unknowns

Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.

Analysis cutoff: Sat, 9 May 2026, 17:00 UTC · analysis-v4