Ligue 1 · 2025Stade Raymond-Kopa

Angers 1–0 Paris FC · Ligue 1

1–0Historical match

A completed match from a finished season. This page is the record of what happened.

Match at a glance

Angers won 1–0.

Shots
817
Shots on target
27
Expected goals
0.970.92
Possession
32%68%

Full time

What the match recorded

Angers beat Paris FC 1–0. Recorded in this match (Angers – Paris FC): shots 8–17, shots on target 2–7, expected goals 0.97–0.92, possession 32%–68%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.

This match

Match statistics

  • Shots8 shots17 shotsAngers 8 shots, Paris FC 17 shots
  • Shots on target2 shots7 shotsAngers 2 shots, Paris FC 7 shots
  • Expected goals0.97 xG0.92 xGAngers 0.97 xG, Paris FC 0.92 xG
  • Possession32%68%Angers 32%, Paris FC 68%
  • Corners3 corners7 cornersAngers 3 corners, Paris FC 7 corners
  • Fouls14 fouls10 foulsAngers 14 fouls, Paris FC 10 fouls
  • Yellow cards2 cards1 cardAngers 2 cards, Paris FC 1 card

Every shot

Shot map

Every recorded shot, placed where it was taken and sized by its expected-goals value. Arrows show each team’s attacking direction.

Moses Simon · Paris FC · 23′ · 0.01 xG · off target or blockedIlan Kebbal · Paris FC · 47′ · 0.01 xG · off target or blockedJean-Philippe Krasso · Paris FC · 4′ · 0.02 xG · on targetIlan Kebbal · Paris FC · 22′ · 0.02 xG · on targetIlan Kebbal · Paris FC · 45′ · 0.02 xG · on targetMaxime López · Paris FC · 68′ · 0.02 xG · on targetMaxime López · Paris FC · 89′ · 0.02 xG · off target or blockedSidiki Cherif · Angers · 14′ · 0.03 xG · on targetLohann Doucet · Paris FC · 30′ · 0.03 xG · off target or blockedMathieu Cafaro · Paris FC · 76′ · 0.03 xG · on targetMathieu Cafaro · Paris FC · 80′ · 0.03 xG · off target or blockedVincent Marchetti · Paris FC · 82′ · 0.03 xG · off target or blockedLilian Raolisoa · Angers · 12′ · 0.04 xG · off target or blockedLouis Mouton · Angers · 38′ · 0.04 xG · off target or blockedVincent Marchetti · Paris FC · 69′ · 0.04 xG · off target or blockedMoses Simon · Paris FC · 34′ · 0.05 xG · off target or blockedIlan Kebbal · Paris FC · 70′ · 0.05 xG · off target or blockedJim Allevinah · Angers · 78′ · 0.07 xG · off target or blockedEsteban Lepaul · Angers · 7′ · 0.08 xG · off target or blockedSidiki Cherif · Angers · 7′ · 0.14 xG · off target or blockedJean-Philippe Krasso · Paris FC · 57′ · 0.16 xG · on targetJean-Philippe Krasso · Paris FC · 45′ · 0.18 xG · on targetMathieu Cafaro · Paris FC · 90′ · 0.18 xG · off target or blockedJim Allevinah · Angers · 90′ · 0.19 xG · off target or blockedEsteban Lepaul · Angers · 9′ · 0.36 xG · goal
  • off target
  • on target
  • goal
  • penalty
  • size = xG

Angers: 8 shots, 2 on target, 0.95 xG. Paris FC: 17 shots, 7 on target, 0.90 xG.

How the match built

Expected-goals timeline

Expected goals accumulated minute by minute. Circles mark the goals that were actually scored.

00.510′HT90′Esteban Lepaul · Angers · 9′

The step line is cumulative expected goals; circles mark goals. Final: Angers 0.95 xG · Paris FC 0.90 xG.

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade D · UnavailableUnavailable — unavailable
Season samples1 / 1home / away teams
Recent samples1 / 1last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
  • At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.
  • Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: goals_for, goals_against, xg_for, xg_against, shots, shots_on_target, possession, corners, cards, fouls.
  • The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.
  • The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
Analysis cutoff: Sun, 17 Aug 2025, 19:15 UTC · analysis-v4

Unavailable analysis

The retained evidence does not clear the minimum gates.

Sections that would imply a supported comparison are intentionally omitted.