Ipswich Town
Championship · 2025Ipswich Town 1–1 Leicester City · Championship
A completed match from a finished season. This page is the record of what happened.
Match at a glance
Ipswich Town and Leicester City drew 1–1.
- Shots
- 18–7
- Shots on target
- 3–3
- Expected goals
- 1.85–0.18
- Possession
- 64%–36%
Full time
What the match recorded
Ipswich Town and Leicester City drew 1–1. Recorded in this match (Ipswich Town – Leicester City): shots 18–7, shots on target 3–3, expected goals 1.85–0.18, possession 64%–36%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
Recent scheduling adds useful context
weakA compressed recent schedule is recorded for Ipswich Town.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Rest days and completed matches in the prior 14 days are shown directly.
Window: previous 14 days
| Metric | Ipswich Town | Leicester City | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rest days | 3.8 days | 7.1 days | — |
| Matches last 14 days | 4 matches | 2 matches | — |
Caveat: The database does not describe travel, rotation decisions or player-level workload.
Leicester City show a distinct attacking-volume record
weakLeicester City's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Ipswich Town | Leicester City | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 14.9 shots/match | 11.3 shots/match | 12.5 shots/match |
| Shots against | 9.94 shots/match | 13.5 shots/match | 12.3 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
This match
Match statistics
Every shot
Shot map
Every recorded shot, placed where it was taken and sized by its expected-goals value. Arrows show each team’s attacking direction.
- off target
- on target
- goal
- penalty
- size = xG
Ipswich Town: 18 shots, 3 on target, 1.84 xG. Leicester City: 7 shots, 3 on target, 0.18 xG.
How the match built
Expected-goals timeline
Expected goals accumulated minute by minute. Circles mark the goals that were actually scored.
The step line is cumulative expected goals; circles mark goals. Final: Ipswich Town 1.84 xG · Leicester City 0.18 xG.
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Ipswich Town favored in 11 of 11 directional metrics · Leicester City in 0
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
Ipswich Town / Leicester City
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- The fixture is outside the configured active season.
- Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
- The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
More football
Related matches
Stoke City
Bristol City
Swansea City
Sheffield United
West Bromwich AlbionTeam rankings in Championship
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.