Super League · 2026Chengdu Phoenix Hill Sports Park

Chengdu Rongcheng 1–1 Wuhan Three Towns · Super League

1–1Full-time analysis

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

Match at a glance

Chengdu Rongcheng and Wuhan Three Towns drew 1–1.

Shots
2412
Shots on target
96
Expected goals
3.041.55
Possession
60%40%

Full time

What the match recorded

Chengdu Rongcheng and Wuhan Three Towns drew 1–1. Recorded in this match (Chengdu Rongcheng – Wuhan Three Towns): shots 24–12, shots on target 9–6, expected goals 3.04–1.55, possession 60%–40%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.

Pre-match record

What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.

Chengdu Rongcheng's recent record differs from the season

moderate

Chengdu Rongcheng's last-five goals scored average is below their season average.

1.2 goals/match ▲Goals forLast 5 · Season2 goals/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.

Window: last_5 versus season

MetricLast 5SeasonBaseline
Goals for1.2 goals/match2 goals/match1.46 goals/match

Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.

Chengdu Rongcheng show a distinct attacking-volume record

moderate

Chengdu Rongcheng's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.

15.3 shots/match ▲ShotsChengdu Rongcheng · Wuhan Three Towns12.2 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.

Window: season

MetricChengdu RongchengWuhan Three TownsBaseline
Shots15.3 shots/match12.2 shots/match12.3 shots/match
Shots against10.8 shots/match14 shots/match13.2 shots/match

Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.

The teams have contrasting possession records

moderate

Chengdu Rongcheng have recorded the higher season possession share.

56.6% ●PossessionChengdu Rongcheng · Wuhan Three Towns45.2%
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 11.4 percentage points.

Window: season

MetricChengdu RongchengWuhan Three TownsBaseline
Possession56.6%45.2%49.1%

Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.

This match

Match statistics

  • Shots24 shots12 shotsChengdu Rongcheng 24 shots, Wuhan Three Towns 12 shots
  • Shots on target9 shots6 shotsChengdu Rongcheng 9 shots, Wuhan Three Towns 6 shots
  • Expected goals3.04 xG1.55 xGChengdu Rongcheng 3.04 xG, Wuhan Three Towns 1.55 xG
  • Possession60%40%Chengdu Rongcheng 60%, Wuhan Three Towns 40%
  • Corners9 corners3 cornersChengdu Rongcheng 9 corners, Wuhan Three Towns 3 corners
  • Fouls8 fouls8 foulsChengdu Rongcheng 8 fouls, Wuhan Three Towns 8 fouls

History

Head-to-head

Recent meetings between these teams.

Last 5 meetings

2Chengdu Rongcheng
3Draws
0Wuhan Three Towns
Wuhan Three Towns — Chengdu Rongcheng · Super League0–1
Wuhan Three Towns — Chengdu Rongcheng · Super League2–2
Chengdu Rongcheng — Wuhan Three Towns · Super League1–0
Wuhan Three Towns — Chengdu Rongcheng · Super League1–1
Chengdu Rongcheng — Wuhan Three Towns · Super League2–2

Head-to-Head & Recent Meetings

Metric comparison

Team comparison

Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.

Where the edge is

Season: Chengdu Rongcheng favored in 12 of 13 directional metrics · Wuhan Three Towns in 0 · 1 too close

led this metric higher value (descriptive) too close

Window

Season

Chengdu Rongcheng21 matchesWuhan Three Towns20 matches
2 goals/match ▲Goals scored21/201.4 goals/match
1 goal/match ▲Goals allowed21/201.75 goals/match
2.25 xG/match ▲Expected goals11/131.23 xG/match
15.3 shots/match ▲Shots21/2012.2 shots/match
5.43 shots/match ▲Shots on target21/204.3 shots/match
56.6% ●Possession21/2045.2%
6.86 corners/match ●Corners21/204.7 corners/match
12.5 fouls/matchFouls21/2012.8 fouls/match

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade A · Strong evidenceStrong evidence — ready
Season samples21 / 20home / away teams
Recent samples5 / 5last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
Analysis cutoff: Sat, 1 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC · analysis-v4

Team rankings in Super League

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Turn this match into a graphicReady-made from PitchMath data · No sign-up required