Super League · 2026

Shenzhen Peng City 2–3 Chengdu Rongcheng · Super League

2–3Full-time analysis

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

Match at a glance

Chengdu Rongcheng won 2–3.

Shots
1516
Shots on target
65
Possession
55%45%

Full time

What the match recorded

Chengdu Rongcheng beat Shenzhen Peng City 3–2. Recorded in this match (Shenzhen Peng City – Chengdu Rongcheng): shots 15–16, shots on target 6–5, possession 55%–45%, corners 5–9. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.

Pre-match record

What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.

Chengdu Rongcheng's recent record differs from the season

moderate

Chengdu Rongcheng's last-five goals scored average is below their season average.

1.2 goals/match ▲Goals forLast 5 · Season2.25 goals/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.

Window: last_5 versus season

MetricLast 5SeasonBaseline
Goals for1.2 goals/match2.25 goals/match1.39 goals/match

Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.

Shenzhen Peng City have a visible home split

moderate

Shenzhen Peng City's home-only shot average is above their full-season average.

14.2 shots/match ▲ShotsHome only · Season11.9 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.

Window: home

MetricHome onlySeasonBaseline
Shots14.2 shots/match11.9 shots/match11.8 shots/match

Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.

Chengdu Rongcheng show a distinct attacking-volume record

moderate

Chengdu Rongcheng's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.

11.9 shots/match ▲ShotsShenzhen Peng City · Chengdu Rongcheng14.5 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.

Window: season

MetricShenzhen Peng CityChengdu RongchengBaseline
Shots11.9 shots/match14.5 shots/match11.8 shots/match
Shots against14.3 shots/match10.9 shots/match12.6 shots/match

Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.

This match

Match statistics

  • Shots15 shots16 shotsShenzhen Peng City 15 shots, Chengdu Rongcheng 16 shots
  • Shots on target6 shots5 shotsShenzhen Peng City 6 shots, Chengdu Rongcheng 5 shots
  • Possession55%45%Shenzhen Peng City 55%, Chengdu Rongcheng 45%
  • Corners5 corners9 cornersShenzhen Peng City 5 corners, Chengdu Rongcheng 9 corners
  • Fouls13 fouls13 foulsShenzhen Peng City 13 fouls, Chengdu Rongcheng 13 fouls

History

Head-to-head

Recent meetings between these teams.

Last 5 meetings

0Shenzhen Peng City
1Draws
4Chengdu Rongcheng
Chengdu Rongcheng — Shenzhen Peng City · Super League5–1
Shenzhen Peng City — Chengdu Rongcheng · Super League0–0
Chengdu Rongcheng — Shenzhen Peng City · Super League5–0
Shenzhen Peng City — Chengdu Rongcheng · Super League0–3
Chengdu Rongcheng — Shenzhen Peng City · Super League3–1

Head-to-Head & Recent Meetings

Metric comparison

Team comparison

Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.

Where the edge is

Season: Shenzhen Peng City favored in 0 of 13 directional metrics · Chengdu Rongcheng in 13

led this metric higher value (descriptive) too close

Window

Season

Shenzhen Peng City16 matchesChengdu Rongcheng16 matches
1.38 goals/matchGoals scored16/16▲ 2.25 goals/match
1.75 goals/matchGoals allowed16/16▲ 0.94 goals/match
0.99 xG/matchExpected goals12/9▲ 2.17 xG/match
11.9 shots/matchShots16/16▲ 14.5 shots/match
3.88 shots/matchShots on target16/16▲ 5.5 shots/match
44.2%Possession16/16● 55.3%
5.13 corners/matchCorners16/16● 6.56 corners/match
13.6 fouls/matchFouls16/1612.3 fouls/match

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade A · Strong evidenceStrong evidence — ready
Season samples16 / 16home / away teams
Recent samples5 / 5last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
Analysis cutoff: Sat, 27 Jun 2026, 15:35 UTC · analysis-v4

Team rankings in Super League

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Turn this match into a graphicReady-made from PitchMath data · No sign-up required