Qingdao Hainiu
Super League · 2026Qingdao Hainiu 3–1 Shanghai Port · Super League
This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.
Match at a glance
Qingdao Hainiu won 3–1.
- Shots
- 11–10
- Shots on target
- 4–3
- Possession
- 36%–64%
Full time
What the match recorded
Qingdao Jonoon beat SHANGHAI SIPG 3–1. Recorded in this match (Qingdao Jonoon – SHANGHAI SIPG): shots 11–10, shots on target 4–3, possession 36%–64%, corners 1–5. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
SHANGHAI SIPG have a visible away split
weakSHANGHAI SIPG's away-only shot average is below their full-season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.
Window: away
| Metric | Away only | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 8.75 shots/match | 12.8 shots/match | 12.1 shots/match |
Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.
Qingdao Jonoon's recent record differs from the season
moderateQingdao Jonoon's last-five goals scored average is above their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 1.6 goals/match | 1.22 goals/match | 1.33 goals/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
The teams have contrasting possession records
moderateSHANGHAI SIPG have recorded the higher season possession share.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 17.6 percentage points.
Window: season
| Metric | Qingdao Jonoon | SHANGHAI SIPG | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Possession | 43.4% | 61% | 50.5% |
Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.
This match
Match statistics
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Qingdao Hainiu favored in 1 of 13 directional metrics · Shanghai Port in 12
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 2 matches
Qingdao Hainiu / Shanghai Port
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
More football
Related matches
Wuhan Three Towns
Shenzhen Peng City
Zhejiang
Yunnan Yukun
Beijing GuoanTeam rankings in Super League
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.