Super League · 2026Huzhou Olympic Sports Centre

Zhejiang 0–1 Chongqing Tonglianglong FC · Super League

0–1Full-time analysis

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

Match at a glance

Chongqing Tonglianglong FC won 0–1.

Shots
108
Shots on target
23
Expected goals
0.750.38
Possession
70%30%

Full time

What the match recorded

Chongqing Tongliang Long beat Hangzhou Greentown 1–0. Recorded in this match (Hangzhou Greentown – Chongqing Tongliang Long): shots 10–8, shots on target 2–3, expected goals 0.75–0.38, possession 70%–30%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.

Pre-match record

What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.

Chongqing Tongliang Long show a distinct attacking-volume record

weak

Chongqing Tongliang Long's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.

14.8 shots/match ▲ShotsHangzhou Greentown · Chongqing Tongliang Long9.5 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.

Window: season

MetricHangzhou GreentownChongqing Tongliang LongBaseline
Shots14.8 shots/match9.5 shots/match12.5 shots/match
Shots against13 shots/match9 shots/match13.5 shots/match

Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.

The teams have contrasting possession records

weak

Hangzhou Greentown have recorded the higher season possession share.

62.3% ●PossessionHangzhou Greentown · Chongqing Tongliang Long49.5%
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 12.8 percentage points.

Window: season

MetricHangzhou GreentownChongqing Tongliang LongBaseline
Possession62.3%49.5%50.1%

Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.

This match

Match statistics

  • Shots10 shots8 shotsZhejiang 10 shots, Chongqing Tonglianglong FC 8 shots
  • Shots on target2 shots3 shotsZhejiang 2 shots, Chongqing Tonglianglong FC 3 shots
  • Expected goals0.75 xG0.38 xGZhejiang 0.75 xG, Chongqing Tonglianglong FC 0.38 xG
  • Possession70%30%Zhejiang 70%, Chongqing Tonglianglong FC 30%
  • Corners9 corners1 cornerZhejiang 9 corners, Chongqing Tonglianglong FC 1 corner
  • Fouls9 fouls14 foulsZhejiang 9 fouls, Chongqing Tonglianglong FC 14 fouls
  • Yellow cards1 card2 cardsZhejiang 1 card, Chongqing Tonglianglong FC 2 cards
  • Passes559 passes239 passesZhejiang 559 passes, Chongqing Tonglianglong FC 239 passes
  • Pass accuracy86%71%Zhejiang 86%, Chongqing Tonglianglong FC 71%
  • Shots inside box3 shots5 shotsZhejiang 3 shots, Chongqing Tonglianglong FC 5 shots
  • Blocked shots2 blocks2 blocksZhejiang 2 blocks, Chongqing Tonglianglong FC 2 blocks
  • Goalkeeper saves2 saves2 savesZhejiang 2 saves, Chongqing Tonglianglong FC 2 saves
  • Offsides0 offsides2 offsidesZhejiang 0 offsides, Chongqing Tonglianglong FC 2 offsides

Metric comparison

Team comparison

Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.

Where the edge is

Season: Zhejiang favored in 0 of 13 directional metrics · Chongqing Tonglianglong FC in 0 · 13 too close

led this metric higher value (descriptive) too close

Window

Season

Zhejiang4 matchesChongqing Tonglianglong FC4 matches
1.75 goals/match ▲Goals scored4/41.25 goals/match
0.75 goals/matchGoals allowed4/40.75 goals/match
1.95 xG/match ▲Expected goals4/40.96 xG/match
14.8 shots/match ▲Shots4/49.5 shots/match
6 shots/match ▲Shots on target4/43.25 shots/match
62.3% ●Possession4/449.5%
7.25 corners/match ●Corners4/44.5 corners/match
16 fouls/matchFouls4/414.5 fouls/match

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade C · Limited evidenceLimited evidence — limited
Season samples4 / 4home / away teams
Recent samples4 / 4last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
  • At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
  • The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.
Analysis cutoff: Sun, 5 Apr 2026, 11:30 UTC · analysis-v4

Team rankings in Super League

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Turn this match into a graphicReady-made from PitchMath data · No sign-up required