Henan FC Jiuzu Dukang
Super League · 2026Henan FC Jiuzu Dukang 1–1 Wuhan Three Towns · Super League
This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.
Match at a glance
Henan FC Jiuzu Dukang and Wuhan Three Towns drew 1–1.
- Shots
- 19–7
- Shots on target
- 4–2
- Expected goals
- 1.83–0.63
- Possession
- 66%–34%
Full time
What the match recorded
Henan Jianye and Wuhan Three Towns drew 1–1. Recorded in this match (Henan Jianye – Wuhan Three Towns): shots 19–7, shots on target 4–2, expected goals 1.83–0.63, possession 66%–34%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
Henan Jianye show a distinct attacking-volume record
weakHenan Jianye's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Henan Jianye | Wuhan Three Towns | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 14.7 shots/match | 9 shots/match | 12.7 shots/match |
| Shots against | 16.7 shots/match | 15.3 shots/match | 13.2 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
The teams have contrasting possession records
weakHenan Jianye have recorded the higher season possession share.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 12.7 percentage points.
Window: season
| Metric | Henan Jianye | Wuhan Three Towns | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Possession | 48.3% | 35.7% | 50% |
Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.
This match
Match statistics
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Henan FC Jiuzu Dukang favored in 0 of 11 directional metrics · Wuhan Three Towns in 0 · 11 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 2 matches
Henan FC Jiuzu Dukang / Wuhan Three Towns
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
- At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.
- Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: xg_for, xg_against, cards.
- The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.
More football
Related matches
Yunnan Yukun
Dalian Yingbo FC
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC
Chengdu Rongcheng
Qingdao West Coast
Shenzhen Peng CityTeam rankings in Super League
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.