FC Anyang
K League 1 · 2026FC Anyang 2–1 Ulsan HD · K League 1
Match at a glance
FC Anyang won 2–1.
30-second read
What the record shows
One pattern stands out in the record: ulsan HD's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines. The next-strongest reading is weaker: A compressed recent schedule is recorded for FC Anyang, Ulsan HD. Limitation: Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.
Ulsan HD show a distinct attacking-volume record
moderateUlsan HD's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | FC Anyang | Ulsan HD | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 10.4 shots/match | 14.8 shots/match | 12.3 shots/match |
| Shots against | 14.9 shots/match | 12.8 shots/match | 11.6 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
Recent scheduling adds useful context
weakA compressed recent schedule is recorded for FC Anyang, Ulsan HD.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Rest days and completed matches in the prior 14 days are shown directly.
Window: previous 14 days
| Metric | FC Anyang | Ulsan HD | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rest days | 6 days | 7.1 days | — |
| Matches last 14 days | 3 matches | 3 matches | — |
Caveat: The database does not describe travel, rotation decisions or player-level workload.
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: FC Anyang favored in 0 of 11 directional metrics · Ulsan HD in 10 · 1 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 3 matches
FC Anyang / Ulsan HD
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
More football
Related matches
Gwangju FC
Incheon United
Bucheon FC 1995
Gimcheon Sangmu FC
Gangwon FC
Jeju SKTeam rankings in K League 1
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.