Eliteserien · 2026Sun, 19 Apr 2026, 15:00 UTCFull timeBriskeby ArenaFull-time recap

Ham-Kam

WLL

4–0Full-time recap

KFUM Oslo

WLLD

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

This match

Match statistics

Metric	Ham-Kam	KFUM Oslo
Shots	13 shots/match▲	12 shots/match
Shots on target	6 shots/match▲	2 shots/match
Expected goals	2.62 xG/match▲	0.77 xG/match
Possession	52%	48%
Corners	0 corners/match	3 corners/match
Fouls	15 fouls/match	12 fouls/match
Yellow cards	1 cards/match	0 cards/match▲

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: KFUM Oslo have recorded the higher season possession share. No second pattern clears the sample and coverage gates. Limitation: At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.

The teams have contrasting possession records

weak

KFUM Oslo have recorded the higher season possession share.

44.3%▲PossessionHam-Kam · KFUM Oslo54.8%

Evidence and caveat

Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 10.5 percentage points.

Window: season

Metric	Ham-Kam	KFUM Oslo	Baseline
Possession	44.3%	54.8%	50.2%

Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.

Metric comparison

Values, percentiles and samples

Where the edge is

Ham-Kam favored in 0 of 14 directional metrics · KFUM Oslo in 0 · 14 too close

2 goals/matchGoals scoredseason · 4/51.2 goals/match

2.5 goals/matchGoals allowedseason · 4/52.2 goals/match

1.61 xG/matchExpected goalsseason · 4/51.26 xG/match

1.85 xG/matchExpected goals allowedseason · 4/51.5 xG/match

11.8 shots/matchShotsseason · 4/513.2 shots/match

16 shots/matchShots allowedseason · 4/512 shots/match

4.5 shots/matchShots on targetseason · 4/54.8 shots/match

5.25 shots/matchShots on target allowedseason · 4/55 shots/match

44.3%Possessionseason · 4/554.8%

4.75 corners/matchCornersseason · 4/54.8 corners/match

5.5 corners/matchCorners allowedseason · 4/54 corners/match

—Cardsseason · 2/1—

13.8 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 4/510.6 fouls/match

—Passesseason · 0/0—

—Pass accuracyseason · 0/0—

—Shots inside boxseason · 0/0—

—Blocked shotsseason · 0/0—

—Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0—

—Offsidesseason · 0/0—

25%Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 4/520%

100%Scoring frequencyseason · 4/580%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

Ham-Kam28.1

KFUM Oslo78.1

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

Ham-Kam46.9

KFUM Oslo47.9

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

Ham-Kam16.7

KFUM Oslo44.8

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

Ham-Kam46.9

KFUM Oslo28.1

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

Ham-Kam78.1

KFUM Oslo34.4

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 60%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

Ham-Kam21.9

KFUM Oslo28.1

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

Ham-Kam38.3

KFUM Oslo42.2

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Last 5

4 / 5 matches

2 goals/match▲Goals scored4/51.2 goals/match

2.5 goals/matchGoals allowed4/5▲2.2 goals/match

1.61 xG/match▲Expected goals4/51.26 xG/match

11.8 shots/matchShots4/5▲13.2 shots/match

4.5 shots/matchShots on target4/5▲4.8 shots/match

44.3%Possession4/554.8%

4.75 corners/matchCorners4/54.8 corners/match

—Cards2/1—

13.8 fouls/matchFouls4/510.6 fouls/match

Window

Last 10

4 / 5 matches

2 goals/match▲Goals scored4/51.2 goals/match

2.5 goals/matchGoals allowed4/5▲2.2 goals/match

1.61 xG/match▲Expected goals4/51.26 xG/match

11.8 shots/matchShots4/5▲13.2 shots/match

4.5 shots/matchShots on target4/5▲4.8 shots/match

44.3%Possession4/554.8%

4.75 corners/matchCorners4/54.8 corners/match

—Cards2/1—

13.8 fouls/matchFouls4/510.6 fouls/match

Window

Season

4 / 5 matches

2 goals/match▲Goals scored4/51.2 goals/match

2.5 goals/matchGoals allowed4/5▲2.2 goals/match

1.61 xG/match▲Expected goals4/51.26 xG/match

11.8 shots/matchShots4/5▲13.2 shots/match

4.5 shots/matchShots on target4/5▲4.8 shots/match

44.3%Possession4/554.8%

4.75 corners/matchCorners4/54.8 corners/match

—Cards2/1—

13.8 fouls/matchFouls4/510.6 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

3 / 3 matches

2.33 goals/match▲Goals scored3/31 goals/match

2 goals/match▲Goals allowed3/33 goals/match

1.85 xG/match▲Expected goals3/31.42 xG/match

13 shots/matchShots3/3▲14 shots/match

5 shots/matchShots on target3/3▲5.67 shots/match

45.3%Possession3/353.3%

4.33 corners/matchCorners3/33.67 corners/match

—Cards1/1—

13.3 fouls/matchFouls3/311 fouls/match

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

7 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/17 days

2 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/12 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade C · Limited evidencelimited

Season samples4 / 5home / away teams

Recent samples4 / 5last-five windows

FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match

At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.

Known unknowns

Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.

Analysis cutoff: Sun, 19 Apr 2026, 19:00 UTC · analysis-v4