Allsvenskan · 2026Sat, 18 Apr 2026, 13:00 UTCFull timeStrandvallenFull-time recap

Mjallby AIF

3–0Full-time recap

IF Brommapojkarna

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

This match

Match statistics

Metric	Mjallby AIF	IF Brommapojkarna
Shots	10 shots/match	13 shots/match▲
Shots on target	4 shots/match	4 shots/match
Expected goals	0.68 xG/match	1.8 xG/match▲
Possession	54%	46%
Corners	5 corners/match	1 corners/match
Fouls	16 fouls/match	16 fouls/match
Yellow cards	0 cards/match▲	4 cards/match

30-second read

What the record shows

The clearest recorded pattern is: Mjallby AIF's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines. A second useful context is: Mjallby AIF have recorded the higher season possession share. Limitation: At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.

Mjallby AIF show a distinct attacking-volume record

weak

Mjallby AIF's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.

15.3 shots/match▲ShotsMjallby AIF · IF Brommapojkarna10.7 shots/match

Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.

Window: season

Metric	Mjallby AIF	IF Brommapojkarna	Baseline
Shots	15.3 shots/match	10.7 shots/match	11.3 shots/match
Shots against	12 shots/match	13.7 shots/match	12.5 shots/match

Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.

The teams have contrasting possession records

weak

Mjallby AIF have recorded the higher season possession share.

55%▲PossessionMjallby AIF · IF Brommapojkarna43%

Evidence and caveat

Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 12.0 percentage points.

Window: season

Metric	Mjallby AIF	IF Brommapojkarna	Baseline
Possession	55%	43%	47.2%

Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.

Metric comparison

Values, percentiles and samples

Where the edge is

Mjallby AIF favored in 0 of 14 directional metrics · IF Brommapojkarna in 0 · 14 too close

1 goals/matchGoals scoredseason · 3/31.33 goals/match

1.67 goals/matchGoals allowedseason · 3/32.33 goals/match

—Expected goalsseason · 2/31.32 xG/match

—Expected goals allowedseason · 2/31.27 xG/match

15.3 shots/matchShotsseason · 3/310.7 shots/match

12 shots/matchShots allowedseason · 3/313.7 shots/match

5.33 shots/matchShots on targetseason · 3/34 shots/match

4.33 shots/matchShots on target allowedseason · 3/34 shots/match

55%Possessionseason · 3/343%

6.67 corners/matchCornersseason · 3/32.67 corners/match

2 corners/matchCorners allowedseason · 3/36.67 corners/match

—Cardsseason · 0/0—

13.3 fouls/matchFoulsseason · 3/312.7 fouls/match

—Passesseason · 0/0—

—Pass accuracyseason · 0/0—

—Shots inside boxseason · 0/0—

—Blocked shotsseason · 0/0—

—Goalkeeper savesseason · 0/0—

—Offsidesseason · 0/0—

33%Clean-sheet frequencyseason · 3/30%

33%Scoring frequencyseason · 3/367%

Style profile

How the teams compare

Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.

Possession control

Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.

Mjallby AIF70.8

IF Brommapojkarna20.8

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Attacking volume

Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.

Mjallby AIF59.7

IF Brommapojkarna47.2

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Defensive resistance

Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.

Mjallby AIF50

IF Brommapojkarna33.3

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Directness proxy

Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.

Mjallby AIF70.8

IF Brommapojkarna54.2

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Physicality

Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.

Mjallby AIF62.5

IF Brommapojkarna45.8

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 50%

Set-piece relevance

Corner volume relative to competition peers.

Mjallby AIF79.2

IF Brommapojkarna12.5

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Tempo and pressure proxy

Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.

Mjallby AIF74

IF Brommapojkarna37.5

0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100%

Recent form

Season, last 10 and last 5

Window

Last 5

3 / 3 matches

1 goals/matchGoals scored3/3▲1.33 goals/match

1.67 goals/match▲Goals allowed3/32.33 goals/match

—Expected goals2/31.32 xG/match

15.3 shots/match▲Shots3/310.7 shots/match

5.33 shots/match▲Shots on target3/34 shots/match

55%Possession3/343%

6.67 corners/matchCorners3/32.67 corners/match

—Cards0/0—

13.3 fouls/matchFouls3/312.7 fouls/match

Window

Last 10

3 / 3 matches

1 goals/matchGoals scored3/3▲1.33 goals/match

1.67 goals/match▲Goals allowed3/32.33 goals/match

—Expected goals2/31.32 xG/match

15.3 shots/match▲Shots3/310.7 shots/match

5.33 shots/match▲Shots on target3/34 shots/match

55%Possession3/343%

6.67 corners/matchCorners3/32.67 corners/match

—Cards0/0—

13.3 fouls/matchFouls3/312.7 fouls/match

Window

Season

3 / 3 matches

1 goals/matchGoals scored3/3▲1.33 goals/match

1.67 goals/match▲Goals allowed3/32.33 goals/match

—Expected goals2/31.32 xG/match

15.3 shots/match▲Shots3/310.7 shots/match

5.33 shots/match▲Shots on target3/34 shots/match

55%Possession3/343%

6.67 corners/matchCorners3/32.67 corners/match

—Cards0/0—

13.3 fouls/matchFouls3/312.7 fouls/match

Venue split

Home and away samples

Window

Home team at home / away team away

2 / 2 matches

—Goals scored2/2—

—Goals allowed2/2—

—Expected goals2/2—

—Shots2/2—

—Shots on target2/2—

—Possession2/2—

—Corners2/2—

—Cards0/0—

—Fouls2/2—

Schedule context

Rest and recent workload

7 daysRest before fixtureprevious completed fixtures · 1/14.83 days

2 matchesMatches in previous 14 daysprevious completed fixtures · 1/12 matches

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade C · Limited evidencelimited

Season samples3 / 3home / away teams

Recent samples3 / 3last-five windows

FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match

At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.
Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.

Known unknowns

Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: xg_for, xg_against, cards.
The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.

Analysis cutoff: Sat, 18 Apr 2026, 17:00 UTC · analysis-v4