Super League · 2022Guangzhou FC 0–0 Tianjin Jinmen Tiger · Super League
A completed match from a finished season. This page is the record of what happened.
Match at a glance
Guangzhou FC and Tianjin Jinmen Tiger drew 0–0.
- Shots
- 8–9
- Shots on target
- 1–2
- Possession
- 65%–35%
Full time
What the match recorded
Guangzhou FC and Tianjin Jinmen Tiger drew 0–0. Recorded in this match (Guangzhou FC – Tianjin Jinmen Tiger): shots 8–9, shots on target 1–2, possession 65%–35%, corners 7–6. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
Guangzhou FC's recent record differs from the season
moderateGuangzhou FC's last-five goals scored average is above their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 1 goal/match | 0.65 goals/match | 1.37 goals/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
Guangzhou FC show a distinct attacking-volume record
moderateGuangzhou FC's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Guangzhou FC | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 9 shots/match | 12.1 shots/match | 11.5 shots/match |
| Shots against | 12.9 shots/match | 9.41 shots/match | 10.8 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
This match
Match statistics
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Guangzhou FC favored in 0 of 9 directional metrics · Tianjin Jinmen Tiger in 8 · 1 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 2 matches
Guangzhou FC / Tianjin Jinmen Tiger
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- The fixture is outside the configured active season.
- Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: xg_for, xg_against, cards.
- The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
More football
Related matches
Henan FC Jiuzu Dukang
Zhejiang
Shanghai ShenhuaTeam rankings in Super League
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.