Super League · 2022

Wuhan Three Towns 0–1 Chengdu Rongcheng · Super League

0–1Historical match

A completed match from a finished season. This page is the record of what happened.

Match at a glance

Chengdu Rongcheng won 0–1.

Shots
109
Shots on target
37
Possession
49%51%

Full time

What the match recorded

Chengdu Rongcheng beat Wuhan Three Towns 1–0. Recorded in this match (Wuhan Three Towns – Chengdu Rongcheng): shots 10–9, shots on target 3–7, possession 49%–51%, corners 5–5. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.

Pre-match record

What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.

Chengdu Rongcheng's recent record differs from the season

moderate

Chengdu Rongcheng's last-five goals scored average is below their season average.

0.6 goals/match ▲Goals forLast 5 · Season1 goal/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.

Window: last_5 versus season

MetricLast 5SeasonBaseline
Goals for0.6 goals/match1 goal/match1.3 goals/match

Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.

Recent scheduling adds useful context

weak

A compressed recent schedule is recorded for Wuhan Three Towns.

4 days ▲Rest daysWuhan Three Towns · Chengdu Rongcheng5.19 days
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Rest days and completed matches in the prior 14 days are shown directly.

Window: previous 14 days

MetricWuhan Three TownsChengdu RongchengBaseline
Rest days4 days5.19 days—
Matches last 14 days1 match1 match—

Caveat: The database does not describe travel, rotation decisions or player-level workload.

Wuhan Three Towns show a distinct attacking-volume record

moderate

Wuhan Three Towns's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.

17.6 shots/match ▲ShotsWuhan Three Towns · Chengdu Rongcheng12.5 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.

Window: season

MetricWuhan Three TownsChengdu RongchengBaseline
Shots17.6 shots/match12.5 shots/match11.5 shots/match
Shots against8.32 shots/match9.05 shots/match10.4 shots/match

Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.

This match

Match statistics

  • Shots10 shots9 shotsWuhan Three Towns 10 shots, Chengdu Rongcheng 9 shots
  • Shots on target3 shots7 shotsWuhan Three Towns 3 shots, Chengdu Rongcheng 7 shots
  • Possession49%51%Wuhan Three Towns 49%, Chengdu Rongcheng 51%
  • Corners5 corners5 cornersWuhan Three Towns 5 corners, Chengdu Rongcheng 5 corners
  • Fouls20 fouls15 foulsWuhan Three Towns 20 fouls, Chengdu Rongcheng 15 fouls

Metric comparison

Team comparison

Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.

Where the edge is

Season: Wuhan Three Towns favored in 6 of 9 directional metrics · Chengdu Rongcheng in 2 · 1 too close

led this metric higher value (descriptive) too close

Window

Season

Wuhan Three Towns22 matchesChengdu Rongcheng22 matches
2.86 goals/match ▲Goals scored22/221 goal/match
0.82 goals/match ▲Goals allowed22/220.95 goals/match
17.6 shots/match ▲Shots22/2212.5 shots/match
6.77 shots/match ▲Shots on target22/223.68 shots/match
51.8% ●Possession22/2250.9%
5.59 corners/match ●Corners22/225.27 corners/match
13.6 fouls/matchFouls22/2213.9 fouls/match

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade A · Strong evidenceStrong evidence — limited
Season samples22 / 22home / away teams
Recent samples5 / 5last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • The fixture is outside the configured active season.
  • Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: xg_for, xg_against, cards.
  • The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
Analysis cutoff: Sat, 29 Oct 2022, 15:30 UTC · analysis-v4

Team rankings in Super League

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Turn this match into a graphicReady-made from PitchMath data · No sign-up required