Beijing Guoan
Super League · 2023Beijing Guoan 1–1 Tianjin Jinmen Tiger · Super League
A completed match from a finished season. This page is the record of what happened.
Match at a glance
Beijing Guoan and Tianjin Jinmen Tiger drew 1–1.
- Shots
- 13–13
- Shots on target
- 4–5
- Expected goals
- 0.95–0.84
- Possession
- 57%–43%
Full time
What the match recorded
Beijing Guoan and Tianjin Jinmen Tiger drew 1–1. Recorded in this match (Beijing Guoan – Tianjin Jinmen Tiger): shots 13–13, shots on target 4–5, expected goals 0.95–0.84, possession 57%–43%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
Recent scheduling adds useful context
weakA compressed recent schedule is recorded for Tianjin Jinmen Tiger.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Rest days and completed matches in the prior 14 days are shown directly.
Window: previous 14 days
| Metric | Beijing Guoan | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rest days | 5 days | 4 days | — |
| Matches last 14 days | 2 matches | 3 matches | — |
Caveat: The database does not describe travel, rotation decisions or player-level workload.
Both teams have elevated corners records
weakEach team's season corners average is above the competition baseline.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Both team averages are compared with the same competition baseline.
Window: season
| Metric | Beijing Guoan | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corners | 6.5 corners/match | 5.17 corners/match | 4.58 corners/match |
Caveat: A shared historical pattern is descriptive and may not repeat in one fixture.
The teams have contrasting possession records
moderateBeijing Guoan have recorded the higher season possession share.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 11.7 percentage points.
Window: season
| Metric | Beijing Guoan | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Possession | 59.3% | 47.7% | 49.9% |
Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.
This match
Match statistics
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Beijing Guoan favored in 4 of 11 directional metrics · Tianjin Jinmen Tiger in 4 · 3 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
Beijing Guoan / Tianjin Jinmen Tiger
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
- The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
More football
Related matches
Henan FC Jiuzu Dukang
ZhejiangTeam rankings in Super League
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.