Super League · 2024

Chengdu Rongcheng 2–2 Wuhan Three Towns · Super League

2–2Historical match

A completed match from a finished season. This page is the record of what happened.

Match at a glance

Chengdu Rongcheng and Wuhan Three Towns drew 2–2.

Shots
163
Shots on target
52
Expected goals
1.230.24
Possession
65%35%

Full time

What the match recorded

Chengdu Rongcheng and Wuhan Three Towns drew 2–2. Recorded in this match (Chengdu Rongcheng – Wuhan Three Towns): shots 16–3, shots on target 5–2, expected goals 1.23–0.24, possession 65%–35%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.

Pre-match record

What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.

Wuhan Three Towns have a visible away split

moderate

Wuhan Three Towns's away-only shot average is below their full-season average.

8.2 shots/match ▲ShotsAway only · Season11.6 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.

Window: away

MetricAway onlySeasonBaseline
Shots8.2 shots/match11.6 shots/match12.7 shots/match

Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.

Wuhan Three Towns show a distinct attacking-volume record

moderate

Wuhan Three Towns's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit below their competition baselines.

15 shots/match ▲ShotsChengdu Rongcheng · Wuhan Three Towns11.6 shots/match
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.

Window: season

MetricChengdu RongchengWuhan Three TownsBaseline
Shots15 shots/match11.6 shots/match12.7 shots/match
Shots against7.33 shots/match12 shots/match12.9 shots/match

Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.

The teams have contrasting possession records

moderate

Chengdu Rongcheng have recorded the higher season possession share.

58.3% ●PossessionChengdu Rongcheng · Wuhan Three Towns49.9%
Evidence and caveat

Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 8.4 percentage points.

Window: season

MetricChengdu RongchengWuhan Three TownsBaseline
Possession58.3%49.9%49.8%

Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.

This match

Match statistics

  • Shots16 shots3 shotsChengdu Rongcheng 16 shots, Wuhan Three Towns 3 shots
  • Shots on target5 shots2 shotsChengdu Rongcheng 5 shots, Wuhan Three Towns 2 shots
  • Expected goals1.23 xG0.24 xGChengdu Rongcheng 1.23 xG, Wuhan Three Towns 0.24 xG
  • Possession65%35%Chengdu Rongcheng 65%, Wuhan Three Towns 35%
  • Corners8 corners0 cornersChengdu Rongcheng 8 corners, Wuhan Three Towns 0 corners
  • Fouls17 fouls20 foulsChengdu Rongcheng 17 fouls, Wuhan Three Towns 20 fouls

History

Head-to-head

Recent meetings between these teams.

Last 5 meetings

2Chengdu Rongcheng
1Draws
1Wuhan Three Towns
Chengdu Rongcheng — Wuhan Three Towns · Super League0–1
Wuhan Three Towns — Chengdu Rongcheng · Super League3–3
Chengdu Rongcheng — Wuhan Three Towns · Super League1–0
Wuhan Three Towns — Chengdu Rongcheng · Super League0–1

Head-to-Head & Recent Meetings

Metric comparison

Team comparison

Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.

Where the edge is

Season: Chengdu Rongcheng favored in 9 of 11 directional metrics · Wuhan Three Towns in 0 · 2 too close

led this metric higher value (descriptive) too close

Window

Season

Chengdu Rongcheng9 matchesWuhan Three Towns9 matches
1.78 goals/match ▲Goals scored9/91.33 goals/match
0.89 goals/match ▲Goals allowed9/91.78 goals/match
1.86 xG/match ▲Expected goals9/91.21 xG/match
15 shots/match ▲Shots9/911.6 shots/match
4.33 shots/matchShots on target9/94.33 shots/match
58.3% ●Possession9/949.9%
7.56 corners/match ●Corners9/93.56 corners/match
14.4 fouls/matchFouls9/913.2 fouls/match

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade B · Useful evidenceUseful evidence — limited
Season samples9 / 9home / away teams
Recent samples5 / 5last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
  • The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
Analysis cutoff: Wed, 1 May 2024, 15:35 UTC · analysis-v4

Team rankings in Super League

Make a graphic from this match

Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.

Turn this match into a graphicReady-made from PitchMath data · No sign-up required