Match at a glance Nantong Zhiyun and Tianjin Jinmen Tiger drew 1–1.
Shots 12 – 19
Shots on target 2 – 3
Expected goals 1.27 – 1.28
Possession 37% – 63% Story Stats H2H Comparison Evidence More football Full time
What the match recorded Nantong Zhiyun and Tianjin Jinmen Tiger drew 1–1. Recorded in this match (Nantong Zhiyun – Tianjin Jinmen Tiger): shots 12–19, shots on target 2–3, expected goals 1.27–1.28, possession 37%–63%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
This match
Match statistics Nantong Zhiyun Tianjin Jinmen Tiger
Shots 12 shots 19 shots Nantong Zhiyun 12 shots, Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 19 shots Shots on target 2 shots 3 shots Nantong Zhiyun 2 shots, Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 3 shots Expected goals 1.27 xG 1.28 xG Nantong Zhiyun 1.27 xG, Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 1.28 xG Possession 37% 63% Nantong Zhiyun 37%, Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 63% Corners 0 corners 8 corners Nantong Zhiyun 0 corners, Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 8 corners Fouls 8 fouls 15 fouls Nantong Zhiyun 8 fouls, Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 15 fouls History
Head-to-head Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
0 Nantong Zhiyun
2 Draws
1 Tianjin Jinmen Tiger
2 Mar 2024 Tianjin Jinmen Tiger — Nantong Zhiyun · Super League 1–1
4 Nov 2023 Nantong Zhiyun — Tianjin Jinmen Tiger · Super League 1–2
7 Jul 2023 Tianjin Jinmen Tiger — Nantong Zhiyun · Super League 1–1
Head-to-Head & Recent Meetings
Metric comparison
Team comparison Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Where the edge is Season: Nantong Zhiyun favored in 3 of 11 directional metrics · Tianjin Jinmen Tiger in 6 · 2 too close
▲ led this metric● higher value (descriptive)
Season Last 10 Last 5 Home–Away Style profile Rest and recent workload
Nantong Zhiyun 16 matches Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 16 matches
1.06 goals/match Goals scored16/16 ▲ 1.44 goals/match
2 goals/match Goals allowed16/16 ▲ 1.38 goals/match
1 xG/match Expected goals16/16 ▲ 1.43 xG/match
11.9 shots/match Shots16/16 ▲ 13.3 shots/match
2.81 shots/match Shots on target16/16 ▲ 4.75 shots/match
46.8% Possession16/16 ● 49.3%
4.38 corners/match Corners16/16 ● 4.94 corners/match
12.6 fouls/match Fouls16/16 12.3 fouls/match
Nantong Zhiyun 10 matches Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 10 matches
1.3 goals/match ▲ Goals scored10/10 1.2 goals/match
2.3 goals/match Goals allowed10/10 ▲ 1.7 goals/match
1.24 xG/match Expected goals10/10 ▲ 1.32 xG/match
12.9 shots/match Shots10/10 13.3 shots/match
3.4 shots/match Shots on target10/10 ▲ 4.3 shots/match
45.1% Possession10/10 ● 48.6%
4.4 corners/match Corners10/10 ● 4.9 corners/match
12.7 fouls/match Fouls10/10 10.8 fouls/match
Nantong Zhiyun 5 matches Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 5 matches
1.2 goals/match Goals scored5/5 ▲ 1.4 goals/match
2.6 goals/match Goals allowed5/5 ▲ 2 goals/match
1.37 xG/match Expected goals5/5 1.38 xG/match
13.4 shots/match Shots5/5 13 shots/match
3.4 shots/match Shots on target5/5 ▲ 4 shots/match
40.6% Possession5/5 ● 53.2%
3.4 corners/match Corners5/5 ● 4.8 corners/match
12.2 fouls/match Fouls5/5 10.6 fouls/match
Nantong Zhiyun 8 matches Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 9 matches
0.75 goals/match Goals scored8/9 ▲ 2.11 goals/match
1.75 goals/match Goals allowed8/9 ▲ 1.44 goals/match
1.19 xG/match Expected goals8/9 ▲ 1.57 xG/match
11.8 shots/match Shots8/9 ▲ 12.6 shots/match
2.75 shots/match Shots on target8/9 ▲ 5.22 shots/match
46.4% Possession8/9 ● 48.2%
3.5 corners/match Corners8/9 ● 4.33 corners/match
12.6 fouls/match Fouls8/9 14.4 fouls/match
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100% Attacking volume Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100% Defensive resistance Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100% Directness proxy Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100% Physicality Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 50% Set-piece relevance Corner volume relative to competition peers.
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100% Tempo and pressure proxy Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
0–100 competition percentile · coverage 100% Rest before fixture · Both teams: 11 days Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 1 match Nantong Zhiyun / Tianjin Jinmen Tiger
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis Grade A · Strong evidence Strong evidence — limited
Season samples 16 / 16 home / away teams
Recent samples 5 / 5 last-five windows
Freshness Less than one day from nearest prior match
The fixture is outside the configured active season. Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold. Known unknowns Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset. Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards. The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season. Analysis cutoff: Tue, 25 Jun 2024, 15:35 UTC · analysis-v4 Team rankings in Super League 
Super League · 2024
Wuhan Three Towns
Shenzhen Peng City
Zhejiang
Shanghai Port