Tianjin Jinmen Tiger
Super League · 2024Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 1–0 Qingdao Hainiu · Super League
A completed match from a finished season. This page is the record of what happened.
Match at a glance
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger won 1–0.
- Shots
- 17–7
- Shots on target
- 8–2
- Expected goals
- 1.14–0.78
- Possession
- 64%–36%
Full time
What the match recorded
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger beat Qingdao Hainiu 1–0. Recorded in this match (Tianjin Jinmen Tiger – Qingdao Hainiu): shots 17–7, shots on target 8–2, expected goals 1.14–0.78, possession 64%–36%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
Qingdao Hainiu's recent record differs from the season
moderateQingdao Hainiu's last-five goals scored average is below their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 0.4 goals/match | 0.93 goals/match | 1.41 goals/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger have a visible home split
moderateTianjin Jinmen Tiger's home-only shot average is above their full-season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.
Window: home
| Metric | Home only | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 16.5 shots/match | 13.9 shots/match | 12.9 shots/match |
Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger show a distinct attacking-volume record
moderateTianjin Jinmen Tiger's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | Qingdao Hainiu | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 13.9 shots/match | 11.4 shots/match | 12.9 shots/match |
| Shots against | 14.4 shots/match | 17.6 shots/match | 13.8 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
This match
Match statistics
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Tianjin Jinmen Tiger favored in 11 of 11 directional metrics · Qingdao Hainiu in 0
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 1 match
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger / Qingdao Hainiu
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- The fixture is outside the configured active season.
- Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
- The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
More football
Related matches
Shanghai Port
Qingdao West Coast
Chengdu Rongcheng
Beijing GuoanTeam rankings in Super League
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.