Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 1–4 Shanghai Port · Super League
A completed match from a finished season. This page is the record of what happened.
Match at a glance
Shanghai Port won 1–4.
- Shots
- 8–15
- Shots on target
- 2–7
- Expected goals
- 0.94–2.7
- Possession
- 33%–67%
Full time
What the match recorded
Shanghai Port beat Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 4–1. Recorded in this match (Tianjin Jinmen Tiger – Shanghai Port): shots 8–15, shots on target 2–7, expected goals 0.94–2.7, possession 33%–67%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger have a visible home split
weakTianjin Jinmen Tiger's home-only shot average is above their full-season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.
Window: home
| Metric | Home only | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 21.5 shots/match | 15.9 shots/match | 12.8 shots/match |
Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.
Recent scheduling adds useful context
weakA compressed recent schedule is recorded for Tianjin Jinmen Tiger.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Rest days and completed matches in the prior 14 days are shown directly.
Window: previous 14 days
| Metric | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | Shanghai Port | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rest days | 4.1 days | 9.93 days | — |
| Matches last 14 days | 3 matches | 2 matches | — |
Caveat: The database does not describe travel, rotation decisions or player-level workload.
Shanghai Port show a distinct attacking-volume record
moderateShanghai Port's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | Shanghai Port | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 15.9 shots/match | 17.2 shots/match | 12.8 shots/match |
| Shots against | 13.7 shots/match | 10.5 shots/match | 13.8 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
This match
Match statistics
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Tianjin Jinmen Tiger favored in 1 of 11 directional metrics · Shanghai Port in 8 · 2 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger / Shanghai Port
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Evidence is usable but does not meet the strongest completeness threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
- The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
Team rankings in Super League
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger
Zhejiang
Chengdu Rongcheng
Dalian Yingbo FC
Henan FC Jiuzu Dukang