Beijing Guoan
Super League · 2025Beijing Guoan 2–2 Tianjin Jinmen Tiger · Super League
A completed match from a finished season. This page is the record of what happened.
Match at a glance
Beijing Guoan and Tianjin Jinmen Tiger drew 2–2.
- Shots
- 20–5
- Shots on target
- 8–3
- Expected goals
- 1.51–1.85
- Possession
- 73%–27%
Full time
What the match recorded
Beijing Guoan and Tianjin Jinmen Tiger drew 2–2. Recorded in this match (Beijing Guoan – Tianjin Jinmen Tiger): shots 20–5, shots on target 8–3, expected goals 1.51–1.85, possession 73%–27%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger's recent record differs from the season
moderateTianjin Jinmen Tiger's last-five shots average is below their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 6.6 shots/match | 11.9 shots/match | 12.3 shots/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger have a visible away split
strongTianjin Jinmen Tiger's away-only shot average is below their full-season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.
Window: away
| Metric | Away only | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 8.36 shots/match | 11.9 shots/match | 12.3 shots/match |
Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.
The teams have contrasting possession records
strongBeijing Guoan have recorded the higher season possession share.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 18.3 percentage points.
Window: season
| Metric | Beijing Guoan | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Possession | 65.4% | 47.2% | 48.2% |
Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.
This match
Match statistics
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Beijing Guoan favored in 11 of 11 directional metrics · Tianjin Jinmen Tiger in 0
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 1 match
Beijing Guoan / Tianjin Jinmen Tiger
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- The fixture is outside the configured active season.
- Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
- The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
More football
Related matches
Zhejiang
Qingdao West Coast
Wuhan Three Towns
Shenzhen Peng CityTeam rankings in Super League
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.