Shandong Taishan
Super League · 2025Shandong Taishan 2–1 Tianjin Jinmen Tiger · Super League
A completed match from a finished season. This page is the record of what happened.
Match at a glance
Shandong Taishan won 2–1.
- Shots
- 16–5
- Shots on target
- 9–2
- Expected goals
- 2.25–0.34
- Possession
- 59%–41%
Full time
What the match recorded
Shandong Taishan beat Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 2–1. Recorded in this match (Shandong Taishan – Tianjin Jinmen Tiger): shots 16–5, shots on target 9–2, expected goals 2.25–0.34, possession 59%–41%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger have a visible away split
strongTianjin Jinmen Tiger's away-only shot average is below their full-season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.
Window: away
| Metric | Away only | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 8.27 shots/match | 11.3 shots/match | 12.8 shots/match |
Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger's recent record differs from the season
moderateTianjin Jinmen Tiger's last-five shots average is below their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 8.4 shots/match | 11.3 shots/match | 12.8 shots/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
Shandong Taishan show a distinct attacking-volume record
weakShandong Taishan's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Shandong Taishan | Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 16.5 shots/match | 11.3 shots/match | 12.8 shots/match |
| Shots against | 13.8 shots/match | 13.2 shots/match | 13.6 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
This match
Match statistics
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Shandong Taishan favored in 6 of 11 directional metrics · Tianjin Jinmen Tiger in 2 · 3 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 2 matches
Shandong Taishan / Tianjin Jinmen Tiger
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- The fixture is outside the configured active season.
- Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
- The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
More football
Related matches
Shanghai Port
Beijing Guoan
Dalian Yingbo FCTeam rankings in Super League
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.