Premier League · 2022

FC Khimki 1–1 Zenit St. Petersburg · Premier League

1–1Historical match

A completed match from a finished season. This page is the record of what happened.

Match at a glance

FC Khimki and Zenit St. Petersburg drew 1–1.

Shots
87
Shots on target
32
Expected goals
0.910.42
Possession
34%66%

Full time

What the match recorded

FC Khimki and Zenit St. Petersburg drew 1–1. Recorded in this match (FC Khimki – Zenit St. Petersburg): shots 8–7, shots on target 3–2, expected goals 0.91–0.42, possession 34%–66%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.

This match

Match statistics

  • Shots8 shots7 shotsFC Khimki 8 shots, Zenit St. Petersburg 7 shots
  • Shots on target3 shots2 shotsFC Khimki 3 shots, Zenit St. Petersburg 2 shots
  • Expected goals0.91 xG0.42 xGFC Khimki 0.91 xG, Zenit St. Petersburg 0.42 xG
  • Possession34%66%FC Khimki 34%, Zenit St. Petersburg 66%
  • Corners2 corners8 cornersFC Khimki 2 corners, Zenit St. Petersburg 8 corners
  • Fouls8 fouls10 foulsFC Khimki 8 fouls, Zenit St. Petersburg 10 fouls

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade D · UnavailableUnavailable — unavailable
Season samples1 / 1home / away teams
Recent samples1 / 1last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
  • At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.
  • Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: goals_for, goals_against, xg_for, xg_against, shots, shots_on_target, possession, corners, cards, fouls.
  • The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.
  • The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
Analysis cutoff: Fri, 15 Jul 2022, 21:00 UTC · analysis-v4

Unavailable analysis

The retained evidence does not clear the minimum gates.

Sections that would imply a supported comparison are intentionally omitted.