Premier League · 2022

Orenburg 2–4 Krylya Sovetov Samara · Premier League

2–4Historical match

A completed match from a finished season. This page is the record of what happened.

Match at a glance

Krylya Sovetov Samara won 2–4.

Shots
1727
Shots on target
89
Expected goals
1.772.92
Possession
42%58%

Full time

What the match recorded

Krylya Sovetov Samara beat Orenburg 4–2. Recorded in this match (Orenburg – Krylya Sovetov Samara): shots 17–27, shots on target 8–9, expected goals 1.77–2.92, possession 42%–58%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.

This match

Match statistics

  • Shots17 shots27 shotsOrenburg 17 shots, Krylya Sovetov Samara 27 shots
  • Shots on target8 shots9 shotsOrenburg 8 shots, Krylya Sovetov Samara 9 shots
  • Expected goals1.77 xG2.92 xGOrenburg 1.77 xG, Krylya Sovetov Samara 2.92 xG
  • Possession42%58%Orenburg 42%, Krylya Sovetov Samara 58%
  • Corners8 corners3 cornersOrenburg 8 corners, Krylya Sovetov Samara 3 corners
  • Fouls9 fouls3 foulsOrenburg 9 fouls, Krylya Sovetov Samara 3 fouls

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade D · UnavailableUnavailable — unavailable
Season samples1 / 1home / away teams
Recent samples1 / 1last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
  • At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.
  • Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: goals_for, goals_against, xg_for, xg_against, shots, shots_on_target, possession, corners, cards, fouls.
  • The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.
  • The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
Analysis cutoff: Sat, 16 Jul 2022, 18:30 UTC · analysis-v4

Unavailable analysis

The retained evidence does not clear the minimum gates.

Sections that would imply a supported comparison are intentionally omitted.