This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.
This match
Match statistics
| Metric | Reading | Luton Town |
|---|---|---|
| Shots | 17 shots ▲ | 12 shots |
| Shots on target | 5 shots | 5 shots |
| Expected goals | 1.77 xG ▲ | 1.6 xG |
| Possession | 41% | 59% ● |
| Corners | 5 corners ● | 2 corners |
| Fouls | 12 fouls | 11 fouls |
Every shot
Shot map
Every recorded shot, placed where it was taken and sized by its expected-goals value. Each team attacks towards its own end of the pitch.
- off target
- on target
- goal
- penalty
- size = xG
Reading: 16 shots, 5 on target, 1.79 xG. Luton Town: 12 shots, 5 on target, 1.59 xG. · 1 unplaced
How the match built
Expected-goals timeline
Expected goals accumulated minute by minute. Circles mark the goals that were actually scored.
The step line is cumulative expected goals; circles mark goals. Final: Reading 1.79 xG · Luton Town 1.59 xG.
Full time
What the match recorded
Luton Town beat Reading 4–3. Recorded in this match (Reading – Luton Town): shots 17–12, shots on target 5–5, expected goals 1.77–1.6, possession 41%–59%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Unavailable analysis
The retained evidence does not clear the minimum gates.
Sections that would imply a supported comparison are intentionally omitted.
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
- At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.
- Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: goals_for, goals_against, xg_for, xg_against, shots, shots_on_target, possession, corners, cards, fouls.
- The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.
Reading
AFC Wimbledon
Oxford United
Milton Keynes Dons
Leicester City