Racing Club
Liga Profesional de Fútbol · 2026Racing Club 0–1 Banfield · Liga Profesional de Fútbol
This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.
Match at a glance
Banfield won 0–1.
- Shots
- 23–6
- Shots on target
- 2–2
- Expected goals
- 2.15–0.4
- Possession
- 82%–18%
Full time
What the match recorded
Banfield beat Racing Club 1–0. Recorded in this match (Racing Club – Banfield): shots 23–6, shots on target 2–2, expected goals 2.15–0.4, possession 82%–18%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
Banfield's recent record differs from the season
moderateBanfield's last-five goals scored average is below their season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: An unweighted last-five average is compared with the unweighted season average.
Window: last_5 versus season
| Metric | Last 5 | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goals for | 0.6 goals/match | 0.9 goals/match | 1.02 goals/match |
Caveat: Five matches are sensitive to opponent mix and isolated match states.
Racing Club show a distinct attacking-volume record
moderateRacing Club's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | Racing Club | Banfield | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 12.5 shots/match | 11.8 shots/match | 11.8 shots/match |
| Shots against | 9.67 shots/match | 16.6 shots/match | 11.9 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
Banfield have a visible away split
moderateBanfield's away-only shot average is below their full-season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.
Window: away
| Metric | Away only | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 9.18 shots/match | 11.8 shots/match | 11.8 shots/match |
Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.
This match
Match statistics
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: Racing Club favored in 9 of 13 directional metrics · Banfield in 1 · 3 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
Racing Club / Banfield
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
More football
Related matches
Belgrano
San Lorenzo
Club Atlético Unión de Santa Fe
Aldosivi
TigreTeam rankings in Liga Profesional de Fútbol
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.