Premier League · 2022

FK Krasnodar 2–2 Fakel Voronezh · Premier League

2–2Historical match

A completed match from a finished season. This page is the record of what happened.

Match at a glance

FK Krasnodar and Fakel Voronezh drew 2–2.

Shots
2116
Shots on target
610
Expected goals
2.223.29
Possession
66%34%

Full time

What the match recorded

FK Krasnodar and Fakel Voronezh drew 2–2. Recorded in this match (FK Krasnodar – Fakel Voronezh): shots 21–16, shots on target 6–10, expected goals 2.22–3.29, possession 66%–34%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.

This match

Match statistics

  • Shots21 shots16 shotsFK Krasnodar 21 shots, Fakel Voronezh 16 shots
  • Shots on target6 shots10 shotsFK Krasnodar 6 shots, Fakel Voronezh 10 shots
  • Expected goals2.22 xG3.29 xGFK Krasnodar 2.22 xG, Fakel Voronezh 3.29 xG
  • Possession66%34%FK Krasnodar 66%, Fakel Voronezh 34%
  • Corners2 corners3 cornersFK Krasnodar 2 corners, Fakel Voronezh 3 corners
  • Fouls11 fouls12 foulsFK Krasnodar 11 fouls, Fakel Voronezh 12 fouls

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade D · UnavailableUnavailable — unavailable
Season samples1 / 1home / away teams
Recent samples1 / 1last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
  • At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.
  • Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: goals_for, goals_against, xg_for, xg_against, shots, shots_on_target, possession, corners, cards, fouls.
  • The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.
  • The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
Analysis cutoff: Sun, 17 Jul 2022, 21:00 UTC · analysis-v4

Unavailable analysis

The retained evidence does not clear the minimum gates.

Sections that would imply a supported comparison are intentionally omitted.