Premier League · 2022

Rodina Moscow 0–3 Nizhny Novgorod · Premier League

0–3Historical match

A completed match from a finished season. This page is the record of what happened.

Match at a glance

Nizhny Novgorod won 0–3.

Shots
1219
Shots on target
69
Expected goals
1.182.87
Possession
54%46%

Full time

What the match recorded

Pari Nizhny Novgorod beat Rodina Moscow 3–0. Recorded in this match (Rodina Moscow – Pari Nizhny Novgorod): shots 12–19, shots on target 6–9, expected goals 1.18–2.87, possession 54%–46%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.

This match

Match statistics

  • Shots12 shots19 shotsRodina Moscow 12 shots, Nizhny Novgorod 19 shots
  • Shots on target6 shots9 shotsRodina Moscow 6 shots, Nizhny Novgorod 9 shots
  • Expected goals1.18 xG2.87 xGRodina Moscow 1.18 xG, Nizhny Novgorod 2.87 xG
  • Possession54%46%Rodina Moscow 54%, Nizhny Novgorod 46%
  • Corners6 corners6 cornersRodina Moscow 6 corners, Nizhny Novgorod 6 corners
  • Fouls14 fouls12 foulsRodina Moscow 14 fouls, Nizhny Novgorod 12 fouls

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade D · UnavailableUnavailable — unavailable
Season samples1 / 31home / away teams
Recent samples1 / 5last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
  • At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.
  • Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: goals_for, goals_against, xg_for, xg_against, shots, shots_on_target, possession, corners, cards, fouls.
  • The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.
  • The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
Analysis cutoff: Wed, 7 Jun 2023, 19:00 UTC · analysis-v4

Unavailable analysis

The retained evidence does not clear the minimum gates.

Sections that would imply a supported comparison are intentionally omitted.