FC Anyang
K League 1 · 2025FC Anyang 0–1 Ulsan HD · K League 1
A completed match from a finished season. This page is the record of what happened.
Match at a glance
Ulsan HD won 0–1.
- Shots
- 15–15
- Shots on target
- 4–5
- Expected goals
- 0.67–1.77
- Possession
- 41%–59%
Full time
What the match recorded
Ulsan HD beat FC Anyang 1–0. Recorded in this match (FC Anyang – Ulsan HD): shots 15–15, shots on target 4–5, expected goals 0.67–1.77, possession 41%–59%. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.
Pre-match record
What the data showed before kick-off. Kept for reference; it did not know the result.
Ulsan HD show a distinct attacking-volume record
strongUlsan HD's shot volume and the opposing shot-allowance context sit above their competition baselines.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Team shot volume is paired with the opponent's recorded shot allowance.
Window: season
| Metric | FC Anyang | Ulsan HD | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 12.1 shots/match | 16.3 shots/match | 12.3 shots/match |
| Shots against | 16 shots/match | 9.73 shots/match | 12.3 shots/match |
Caveat: Shot volume describes activity; it does not establish finishing quality or a match outcome.
FC Anyang have a visible home split
moderateFC Anyang's home-only shot average is above their full-season average.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: Venue-only shot volume is compared with the same team's season record.
Window: home
| Metric | Home only | Season | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shots | 14 shots/match | 12.1 shots/match | 12.3 shots/match |
Caveat: Venue splits can reflect opponent mix and should be read with the listed sample.
The teams have contrasting possession records
strongUlsan HD have recorded the higher season possession share.
Evidence and caveat
Comparison: The recorded possession gap is 14.1 percentage points.
Window: season
| Metric | FC Anyang | Ulsan HD | Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Possession | 45.5% | 59.6% | 49.5% |
Caveat: Possession share does not show where possession occurred or how chances were created.
This match
Match statistics
History
Head-to-head
Recent meetings between these teams.
Last 5 meetings
Metric comparison
Team comparison
Season averages, with the sample size beside each metric.
Season: FC Anyang favored in 2 of 11 directional metrics · Ulsan HD in 8 · 1 too close
Window
Season
Window
Last 10
Window
Last 5
Window
Home–Away
Competition percentiles describe recorded style; they do not rank likely outcomes.
Possession control
Relative share of recorded possession within the competition.
Attacking volume
Recorded shot and scoring volume, expressed as competition percentiles.
Defensive resistance
Lower recorded scoring and shot allowance produces a higher descriptive percentile.
Directness proxy
Shots per possession point; a descriptive transition/directness proxy, not an outcome score.
Physicality
Recorded fouls and cards relative to competition peers.
Set-piece relevance
Corner volume relative to competition peers.
Tempo and pressure proxy
Combined event-volume percentiles for shots, corners and fouls.
- Matches in previous 14 days · Both teams: 2 matches
FC Anyang / Ulsan HD
Evidence quality
How much supports this analysis
- The fixture is outside the configured active season.
- Recent samples and important metric coverage meet the strong evidence threshold.
Known unknowns
- Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
- Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: cards.
- The fixture season differs from the competition's configured active season.
More football
Related matches
Jeju SK
Gimcheon Sangmu FC
Jeonbuk Hyundai Motors
Daegu FCTeam rankings in K League 1
Make a graphic from this match
Creator Studio builds a branded post from this match's recorded data, with its evidence grade and source cutoff carried into the export.