UEFA Conference League · 2026

FK Žalgiris 2–5 HNK Hajduk Split · UEFA Conference League

2–5Full-time analysis

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

Match at a glance

HNK Hajduk Split won 2–5.

Shots on target
58
Possession
48%52%

Full time

What the match recorded

HNK Hajduk Split beat FK Žalgiris 5–2. Recorded in this match (FK Žalgiris – HNK Hajduk Split): shots on target 5–8, possession 48%–52%, corners 2–5, fouls 14–20. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.

This match

Match statistics

  • Shots on target5 shots8 shotsFK Žalgiris 5 shots, HNK Hajduk Split 8 shots
  • Possession48%52%FK Žalgiris 48%, HNK Hajduk Split 52%
  • Corners2 corners5 cornersFK Žalgiris 2 corners, HNK Hajduk Split 5 corners
  • Fouls14 fouls20 foulsFK Žalgiris 14 fouls, HNK Hajduk Split 20 fouls
  • Yellow cards3 cards1 cardFK Žalgiris 3 cards, HNK Hajduk Split 1 card
  • Blocked shots4 blocks3 blocksFK Žalgiris 4 blocks, HNK Hajduk Split 3 blocks
  • Offsides2 offsides4 offsidesFK Žalgiris 2 offsides, HNK Hajduk Split 4 offsides

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade D · UnavailableUnavailable — unavailable
Season samples1 / 1home / away teams
Recent samples1 / 1last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
  • At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.
  • Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: goals_for, goals_against, xg_for, xg_against, shots, shots_on_target, possession, corners, cards, fouls.
  • The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.
Analysis cutoff: Thu, 6 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC · analysis-v4

Unavailable analysis

The retained evidence does not clear the minimum gates.

Sections that would imply a supported comparison are intentionally omitted.