UEFA Conference League · 2026

GKS Katowice 2–1 Hapoel Tel Aviv · UEFA Conference League

2–1Full-time analysis

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

Match at a glance

GKS Katowice won 2–1.

Shots on target
73
Possession
67%33%

Full time

What the match recorded

GKS Katowice beat Hapoel Tel Aviv 2–1. Recorded in this match (GKS Katowice – Hapoel Tel Aviv): shots on target 7–3, possession 67%–33%, corners 7–3, fouls 18–18. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.

This match

Match statistics

  • Shots on target7 shots3 shotsGKS Katowice 7 shots, Hapoel Tel Aviv 3 shots
  • Possession67%33%GKS Katowice 67%, Hapoel Tel Aviv 33%
  • Corners7 corners3 cornersGKS Katowice 7 corners, Hapoel Tel Aviv 3 corners
  • Fouls18 fouls18 foulsGKS Katowice 18 fouls, Hapoel Tel Aviv 18 fouls
  • Yellow cards1 card2 cardsGKS Katowice 1 card, Hapoel Tel Aviv 2 cards
  • Blocked shots4 blocks2 blocksGKS Katowice 4 blocks, Hapoel Tel Aviv 2 blocks
  • Offsides3 offsides2 offsidesGKS Katowice 3 offsides, Hapoel Tel Aviv 2 offsides

History

Head-to-head

Recent meetings between these teams.

Last 5 meetings

0GKS Katowice
0Draws
1Hapoel Tel Aviv
Hapoel Tel Aviv — GKS Katowice · UEFA Conference League2–0

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade D · UnavailableUnavailable — unavailable
Season samples1 / 1home / away teams
Recent samples1 / 1last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
  • At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.
  • Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: goals_for, goals_against, xg_for, xg_against, shots, shots_on_target, possession, corners, cards, fouls.
  • The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.
Analysis cutoff: Wed, 12 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC · analysis-v4

Unavailable analysis

The retained evidence does not clear the minimum gates.

Sections that would imply a supported comparison are intentionally omitted.