UEFA Conference League · 2026

RFS 1–2 FK Jablonec · UEFA Conference League

1–2Full-time analysis

This page describes the completed match context. The result is not presented as a prior forecast.

Match at a glance

FK Jablonec won 1–2.

Shots on target
82
Possession
58%42%

Full time

What the match recorded

FK Jablonec beat RFS 2–1. Recorded in this match (RFS – FK Jablonec): shots on target 8–2, possession 58%–42%, corners 4–5, fouls 15–14. This is what was recorded. It is not a claim that the result was foreseeable.

This match

Match statistics

  • Shots on target8 shots2 shotsRFS 8 shots, FK Jablonec 2 shots
  • Possession58%42%RFS 58%, FK Jablonec 42%
  • Corners4 corners5 cornersRFS 4 corners, FK Jablonec 5 corners
  • Fouls15 fouls14 foulsRFS 15 fouls, FK Jablonec 14 fouls
  • Yellow cards3 cards2 cardsRFS 3 cards, FK Jablonec 2 cards
  • Blocked shots6 blocks0 blocksRFS 6 blocks, FK Jablonec 0 blocks
  • Offsides2 offsides1 offsideRFS 2 offsides, FK Jablonec 1 offside

History

Head-to-head

Recent meetings between these teams.

Last 5 meetings

0RFS
0Draws
1FK Jablonec
FK Jablonec — RFS · UEFA Conference League2–0

Evidence quality

How much supports this analysis

Grade D · UnavailableUnavailable — unavailable
Season samples1 / 1home / away teams
Recent samples1 / 1last-five windows
FreshnessLess than one dayfrom nearest prior match
  • At least one team has fewer than the configured season sample.
  • At least one team has an incomplete last-five window.
  • Recorded xG is incomplete, so xG context is omitted where unavailable.

Known unknowns

  • Lineups, injuries, suspensions and tactical changes are not available in the retained dataset.
  • Some metrics are unavailable or below their observation minimum: goals_for, goals_against, xg_for, xg_against, shots, shots_on_target, possession, corners, cards, fouls.
  • The completed-match sample is too small for broad style conclusions.
Analysis cutoff: Thu, 13 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC · analysis-v4

Unavailable analysis

The retained evidence does not clear the minimum gates.

Sections that would imply a supported comparison are intentionally omitted.